Re: code coverage and cpl 1.0/apl 2.0 compatibility

2008-09-03 Thread David E Jones
Thanks for that question Adrian, I was wondering the same thing... -David On Sep 3, 2008, at 23:29, Adrian Crum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm not clear on what you're asking. I use code analysis here, but it's not something I would consider including in the project. Why would the tool's

Re: code coverage and cpl 1.0/apl 2.0 compatibility

2008-09-03 Thread Adam Heath
Adrian Crum wrote: > I'm not clear on what you're asking. I use code analysis here, but it's > not something I would consider including in the project. Why would the > tool's license be an issue? Because if it is part of some standard test-suite run, then it has to be distributed with the project,

Re: code coverage and cpl 1.0/apl 2.0 compatibility

2008-09-03 Thread Adrian Crum
I'm not clear on what you're asking. I use code analysis here, but it's not something I would consider including in the project. Why would the tool's license be an issue? -Adrian Adam Heath wrote: I'm looking at various code coverage tools; there are very few free ones available. I've person

code coverage and cpl 1.0/apl 2.0 compatibility

2008-09-02 Thread Adam Heath
I'm looking at various code coverage tools; there are very few free ones available. I've personally used cobertura; it's gpl v2.0(1), so not compatible. clover is what is installed for use by apache projects; but it's actually non-free, so I'm not even going to consider it. emma is cpl 1.0(2); I