I know that you have already implemented it, but I still don't understand your
response to my original comment... but it is ok.
As regards the serialized/non-serialized item decision, the fact that you have
decided to store the serial number in the FixedAsset entity and not in the
InventoryItem
Jacopo,
i do not know what to say, we already finished implemented it and what
you propose we actually did however without the serialized inventory
because we already have a serial number on the asset
Regards,
Hans
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 08:19 +0200, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> I
Hi Hans,
I can't see what in my notes would prevent from doing this, since you have
already added the fixedAssetId to the InventoryItem entity (as a side note, I
would have preferred the other way round, i.e. if the field inventoryItemId was
added to the FixedAsset entity)?
Regards,
Jacopo
O
Hi Jacopo,
thanks for you comment. I did look into this but decided to not
duplicate data in the system.
In the case where assets for maintenance and depreciation is not
connected with a serialized inventory item we will have a number of
fields duplicated (cost, serial number etc) and we do not k
Hi Hans,
I have read the threads and the blog posts, and considering the requirements:
* the need to maintain (serialized) inventory items and ship/receive them
* the need to depreciate the items as assets
I am wondering if you have considered the design of:
* using product/inventory items (mos
Thanks Adrian and Paul for the valuable comments.
Taking all comments into account, we will do the following: (most is
already done)
1. a single product can refer to one or more assets. (as is now)
2. An asset can refer to a single inventory item. (is added)
3. With this product type, the assetid
>>>> is an instance of a product. So, no - you do not want to connect a
>> fixed
>> >>>>>> asset to a product category.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Product: Die Hard DVD
>> >>>>>> Product Cat
The problem is, you are trying to mix the pricing model with the
product/fixed asset model. That will not work.
Here is how I would set things up based on my understanding of video
rentals:
[Products / Fixed Assets]
Product: Die Hard VHS Cassette
Product Categories: VHS, Action, Drama, Bruce
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 06:56 +0100, Adrian Crum wrote:
> If they are the same product, then they are in the same product categories.
>
so that is limitation of the current datamodel?..looks like i have
to create for every asset a product and a single inventory item of which
many have the same
If they are the same product, then they are in the same product categories.
I have three copies of the Die Hard DVD. Why would I want to put each
one in a different product category? What you are suggesting doesn't
make sense.
It might help if you gave some specific examples of what you are t
Can you help me think in the right direction?
how can i show some fixedassets of the same product in one category and
some of the assets in another category?
Thank you in advance for your help.
Regards,m=
Hans
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 06:47 +0100, Adrian Crum wrote:
> Hans,
>
> The data model sup
Hans,
The data model supports what you are trying to do if YOU think about it.
There is no need to connect a fixed asset to a product category.
-Adrian
On 9/23/2011 6:44 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
sure can do that, but i want a specific instance showing in one category
and another instance showi
sure can do that, but i want a specific instance showing in one category
and another instance showing in a different category..
Adrian, before you answer can you please think about it a bit?
Regards,
Hans
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 06:42 +0100, Adrian Crum wrote:
> Use FixedAssetProduct.
>
> -Ad
Use FixedAssetProduct.
-Adrian
On 9/23/2011 6:37 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
but if you want a particular instance of a product?
I have products (as i described):
In this product type the product is a group of video rentals of the
same rental price referring to many video assets.
Hans
On Fri, 20
but if you want a particular instance of a product?
I have products (as i described):
> In this product type the product is a group of video rentals of the
> same rental price referring to many video assets.
Hans
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 06:32 +0100, Adrian Crum wrote:
> A fixed asset is an instan
A fixed asset is an instance of a product, much like an inventory item
is an instance of a product. So, no - you do not want to connect a fixed
asset to a product category.
Product: Die Hard DVD
Product Categories: DVD, Action, Drama, Bruce Willis
Fixed Assets: 10010, 10011, 1012
-Adrian
On 9
Now we can have rental products where the asset can be rented
In this product type the product is a group of video rentals of the same
rental price referring to many video assets.
However now we also want to categorize these assets in order to display
them on the e-commerce website.
Is addin
17 matches
Mail list logo
