Re: docbook restructure

2011-01-16 Thread Jacques Le Roux
I can see any issues with #2 (if it's the question ;o) Jacques From: "BJ Freeman" see I still have to work on my written communication skills. :D stated two things: 1) i would demo if interested, meaning I would code then demo. 2) looking to see if any one had input before I coded. so I would

Re: docbook restructure

2011-01-16 Thread BJ Freeman
see I still have to work on my written communication skills. :D stated two things: 1) i would demo if interested, meaning I would code then demo. 2) looking to see if any one had input before I coded. so I would not have to change later. so wanted to make sure you did not have any #2.

Re: docbook restructure

2011-01-16 Thread Jacques Le Roux
You asked if someone was interested, so am I. I must say it's not easy to review something with only some sentences. But the idea of separating users from devs documenation sounds good to me. Anyway it seemed that you were ready to do it for "the content component and current help system to use th

Re: docbook restructure

2011-01-15 Thread BJ Freeman
so if the demo works you have no suggestions or changes. dislike putting in the effort then get the suggestions and changes = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation Specialtymarket.co

Re: docbook restructure

2011-01-15 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Could you please demo? Thanks Jacques From: "BJ Freeman" we have two focuses on the Docbook usages 1)whole document for user and technical 2)help screens for individual screens. our current structure is each component has a documents folder then data/datahelp folder. suggest that the docu

docbook restructure

2011-01-14 Thread BJ Freeman
we have two focuses on the Docbook usages 1)whole document for user and technical 2)help screens for individual screens. our current structure is each component has a documents folder then data/datahelp folder. suggest that the documents folder file be a book, one for user and one for technic