David E Jones wrote:
> On Oct 15, 2007, at 10:27 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>
>> Tim Ruppert wrote:
>>> I'm way into seeing groovy included - what's the license on that?
>>
>> http://svn.codehaus.org/groovy/trunk/groovy/groovy-core/LICENSE.txt
>>
>> Which mentions APL 2.0. So, perfect.
>>
>> I wrote c
On Oct 15, 2007, at 10:27 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Tim Ruppert wrote:
I'm way into seeing groovy included - what's the license on that?
http://svn.codehaus.org/groovy/trunk/groovy/groovy-core/LICENSE.txt
Which mentions APL 2.0. So, perfect.
I wrote caching implementations of janino(java), bsh
Tim Ruppert wrote:
> I'm way into seeing groovy included - what's the license on that?
http://svn.codehaus.org/groovy/trunk/groovy/groovy-core/LICENSE.txt
Which mentions APL 2.0. So, perfect.
I wrote caching implementations of janino(java), bsh, groovy,
rhino(javascript), quercus(php), and jrub
I'm way into seeing groovy included - what's the license on that?
Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Oct 15, 2007, at 8:37 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
Will BSH codes be able to use that too?
Our web fra
Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
> Will BSH codes be able to use that too?
Our web framework(not in ofbiz) event languages, which uses janino and
groovy, work with our enums fine. As far as they are concerned, they
look just like static class instances.
Plus, we get to use fancy EnumMap and EnumSet;
Nice. Back to C/C++ enums. But seems like it's much more.
Will BSH codes be able to use that too?
Enums in general are usually int (save space). It's often annoying when some rogue codes attempt
to pass in raw int(s) that do not correspond to any known/programmed enums. So, yes, using Java
1.5
I agree the earlier you catch possible errors the better.
Ray
Tim Ruppert wrote:
> Personally, I'm a fan of any compile time checking :)
>
> Cheers,
> Tim
> --
> Tim Ruppert
> HotWax Media
> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>
> o:801.649.6594
> f:801.649.6595
>
>
> On Oct 14, 2007, at 7:21 PM, Adam He
+1
Jacques
- Message d'origine -
De : Tim Ruppert
À : dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Envoyé : lundi 15 octobre 2007 04:58
Objet : Re: java 1.5 feature usage question
Personally, I'm a fan of any compile time checking :)
Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Me
Personally, I'm a fan of any compile time checking :)
Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Oct 14, 2007, at 7:21 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
How does everyone feel about using enums in ofbiz? For pure java
code,
they are a win. For
How does everyone feel about using enums in ofbiz? For pure java code,
they are a win. For other code, that do something like:
==
myObject.someFunction(Constants.TYPE);
==
there shouldn't be any difference. Once changed, instead of
Constants.TYPE being an int, or a String, it's a class that ex
10 matches
Mail list logo