Hi Charles,
Could you please state with which version this is committed to OFBiz trunk?
I am very much interested in this subject and didn't find anything related
when I upgraded to the latest version this morning.
Regards,
Pierre
2012/1/31 STELTZLEN Charles
> Hi,
>
>
> Yes this is a good i
Hi,
Yes this is a good idea. We did such a modification into an old OFbiz
project and it was very useful.
It's now updated for ofbiz trunk and package as an addon ;-)
We have implemented a new entity called GeneralPropertyAttribute that
allow us to manage dynamic properties.
That solve multi
Yes thanks Joe,
I was (almost) sure I had read something in Commons for properties reloading
but could not put my hand on it
Jacques
From: "Adrian Crum"
Thanks for the reminder Joe!
-Adrian
On 1/29/2012 5:26 PM, J. Eckard wrote:
Apache Commons Configuration can do this.
http://commons.ap
Thanks for the reminder Joe!
-Adrian
On 1/29/2012 5:26 PM, J. Eckard wrote:
Apache Commons Configuration can do this.
http://commons.apache.org/configuration/userguide/howto_multitenant.html#Multi-tenant_Configurations
---
http://osdir.com/ml/user.ofbiz.apache.org/2010-03/msg00343.html
Subj
Apache Commons Configuration can do this.
http://commons.apache.org/configuration/userguide/howto_multitenant.html#Multi-tenant_Configurations
---
http://osdir.com/ml/user.ofbiz.apache.org/2010-03/msg00343.html
Subject: Re: Brainstorming about the Framework: General - msg#00343
List: user.ofbi
lowest level will have the
>>>> accounting.fixedasset.*
>>>> *autocreate name and value=Y
>>>>
>>>> when we have this working we can slowly reorganize these records
>>>> without
>>>> having to change the programs.
>>>>
What could be even more intereting is to add a dynamic way to load a property
in the schema you proposed.
For instance SAP xMII usse a such scheme for dynamic i18n (which is not our
concern since we have xml file for that)
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_xmii115/helpdata/en/Localization/Localizati
Hi Ruth,
Could you elaborate on "true multitenancy", describe it in more details?
Could you compare with current OFBiz solution?
What would be the best way for OFBiz to achieve it?
Thanks
Jacques
From: "Ruth Hoffman"
Hi Pierre:
I understand the premise. I don't understand the value proposit
Then I am always thinking, why didn't you contribute it?
On 01/27/2012 02:49 PM, pierre.gaudin wrote:
Yes this is a good idea. We did such a modification into an old OFbiz
project and it was very useful.
On 27/01/2012 07:40, Hans Bakker wrote:
Problem:
1. If you would like to hav
Hi Pierre:
I understand the premise. I don't understand the value proposition. I
just don't see how this is any better than separate instances. Just
wondered if anyone has done an ROI comparing the two approaches. My
analysis suggests that the OFBiz implementation may not be the best way
to a
Re 1: Sandbox
This is generaly done in larger organization wrt system integration testing
and education/training of endusers.
Re 2: With current version (trunk) of OFbiz this can be done. Keeping in
mind JIRA issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4130 with
regards to privacy.
Regards,
The use cases I can think of:
1. Implement a "sandbox" instance for users to learn on (with demo
data), and also have a "live" instance (with live data). OFBiz users can
learn in the sandbox without affecting live data, and then switch to the
live instance.
2. Offer a customized version of OFB
Yes this is a good idea. We did such a modification into an old OFbiz
project and it was very useful.
On 27/01/2012 07:40, Hans Bakker wrote:
Problem:
1. If you would like to have different tenants on your system and want
to have different property settings for each tenant laike l
Hi Ruth,
For an explanation on multi-tenancy see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multitenancy.
OFBiz does handle specific tenant usage with that datasets for each tenant
can be customer specific and with regards of provision of hot-deploy
applications each application can be made available to the te
Hi Hans, et al.
Could someone take a few minutes and explain to me the value of OFBiz
multi-tenancy? Why not just use SVN or other tool specifically designed
to manage multiple versions of a project where a project is an OFBiz
tenant. The problem as I see it is that the OFBiz multi-tenant
impl
I have been thinking about Properties handling too, not from a
multi-tenant perspective, but from a convenience perspective.
It seems to me the way we handle properties right now could be
simplified. Instead of calling a static utility method to get a property
or using a special mini-language
No it is not, property settings are taken for every tenant from the
properties file.
Do not confuse with userPreferences which are settings per userlogin.
Do not have a list yet...but is not really required because if it is
missing in the entity it still will retrieve it from the properties fil
Hans,
Is it not so that the default currency of any tenant is set when the
ofbiz-setup process is run for that tenant? That should also be the case
with other organizational settings per tenant, like default language.
Do you currently have a list of all the properties that are spread over all
the
Problem:
1. If you would like to have different tenants on your system and want
to have different property settings for each tenant laike language or
currency etc, that is currently not supported.
2. the properties are not very well organized, to say the least.
Proposal:
-
19 matches
Mail list logo
