Re: svn commit: r772941 - in /ofbiz/trunk: framework/common/webcommon/includes/fo/ framework/webtools/webapp/webtools/entity/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/webapp/ecommerce/includes/ specialpurpose/webpos/

2009-05-09 Thread Jacques Le Roux
right_protection#Duration_of_protection Finally I wonder now if we really need to put and end date there...! Maybe David Goodenough can enlighten us ? Jacques From: "David E Jones" Subject: Re: svn commit: r772941 - in /ofbiz/trunk: framework/common/ webcommon/includes/fo/ framewor

Re: svn commit: r772941 - in /ofbiz/trunk: framework/common/webcommon/includes/fo/ framework/webtools/webapp/webtools/entity/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/webapp/ecommerce/includes/ specialpurpose/webpos/

2009-05-09 Thread BJ Freeman
;>> >>>> On May 8, 2009, at 9:49 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>> >>>>> Also I (we?) have not checked this rule >>>>> http://www.law.cornell.edu/treaties/berne/overview.html . I just >>>>> tried but did not find >>>&

Re: svn commit: r772941 - in /ofbiz/trunk: framework/common/webcommon/includes/fo/ framework/webtools/webapp/webtools/entity/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/webapp/ecommerce/includes/ specialpurpose/webpos/

2009-05-09 Thread Jacques Le Roux
yright_protection#Duration_of_protection Finally I wonder now if we really need to put and end date there...! Maybe David Goodenough can enlighten us ? Jacques From: "David E Jones" Subject: Re: svn commit: r772941 - in /ofbiz/trunk: framework/common/ webcommon/includes/fo/ framewor

Re: svn commit: r772941 - in /ofbiz/trunk: framework/common/webcommon/includes/fo/ framework/webtools/webapp/webtools/entity/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/webapp/ecommerce/includes/ specialpurpose/webpos/

2009-05-08 Thread Jacques Le Roux
#Duration_of_protection Finally I wonder now if we really need to put and end date there...! Maybe David Goodenough can enlighten us ? Jacques From: "David E Jones" Subject: Re: svn commit: r772941 - in /ofbiz/trunk: framework/common/ webcommon/includes/fo/ framework/webtools/webap

Re: svn commit: r772941 - in /ofbiz/trunk: framework/common/webcommon/includes/fo/ framework/webtools/webapp/webtools/entity/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/webapp/ecommerce/includes/ specialpurpose/webpos/

2009-05-08 Thread Jacques Le Roux
ight_protection#Duration_of_protection Finally I wonder now if we really need to put and end date there...! Maybe David Goodenough can enlighten us ? Jacques From: "David E Jones" Subject: Re: svn commit: r772941 - in /ofbiz/trunk: framework/common/ webcommon/includes/fo/ framework

Re: svn commit: r772941 - in /ofbiz/trunk: framework/common/webcommon/includes/fo/ framework/webtools/webapp/webtools/entity/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/webapp/ecommerce/includes/ specialpurpose/webpos/

2009-05-08 Thread David E Jones
/wiki/Directive_on_harmonising_the_term_of_copyright_protection#Duration_of_protection Finally I wonder now if we really need to put and end date there...! Maybe David Goodenough can enlighten us ? Jacques From: "David E Jones" Subject: Re: svn commit: r772941 - in /ofbiz/trunk: framework/common/ webcommon/includes/fo/ fra

Re: svn commit: r772941 - in /ofbiz/trunk: framework/common/webcommon/includes/fo/ framework/webtools/webapp/webtools/entity/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/webapp/ecommerce/includes/ specialpurpose/webpos/

2009-05-08 Thread Jacques Le Roux
/Directive_on_harmonising_the_term_of_copyright_protection#Duration_of_protection Finally I wonder now if we really need to put and end date there...! Maybe David Goodenough can enlighten us ? Jacques From: "David E Jones" Subject: Re: svn commit: r772941 - in /ofbiz/trunk: framework/common

Re: svn commit: r772941 - in /ofbiz/trunk: framework/common/webcommon/includes/fo/ framework/webtools/webapp/webtools/entity/ specialpurpose/ecommerce/webapp/ecommerce/includes/ specialpurpose/webpos/

2009-05-08 Thread David E Jones
I think we should undo this change. The dynamic dates represented here do not copyright the files that the code is in, they copyright what the code produces, and that is constantly changing so the dynamic date is appropriate. -David On May 8, 2009, at 5:15 AM, jler...@apache.org wrote: