Anil Patel wrote:
> Adam,
> The service is returning id of two parties created in in the service. I
> don't see anything bad about it. Can you please explain why is it not good?
>
> Also in this modification I have changed variable name used in method,
> partyId out parameter was there before my t
Hi,
As the createLead service is creating PartyRelationship record on the basis
of some parameters conditions so it should return the both partyId only, and
the code committed is improved code to make it more sensible so that the
partyId is now in whole service identified by the leadContactPartyId,
Adam,
The service is returning id of two parties created in in the service.
I don't see anything bad about it. Can you please explain why is it
not good?
Also in this modification I have changed variable name used in method,
partyId out parameter was there before my this commit.
Regards
Anil Pat
Adam,
The service is returning id of two parties created in in the service.
I don't see anything bad about it. Can you please explain why is it
not good?
Also in this modification I have changed variable name used in method,
partyId out parameter was there before my this commit.
Regards
apa...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: apatel
> Date: Wed Jun 24 02:48:28 2009
> New Revision: 787890
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=787890&view=rev
> Log:
> Minor code clean up in createLead service. Convert lead now expires
> relationship instead of deleting it.
>
> Modified:
> ofbi
