Re: svn commit: r898338 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilProperties.java

2010-01-12 Thread Adrian Crum
rred to me that users would use those methods. -Adrian --- On Tue, 1/12/10, Adrian Crum wrote: > From: Adrian Crum > Subject: Re: svn commit: r898338 - > /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilProperties.java > To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org > Date: Tuesday, January

Re: svn commit: r898338 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilProperties.java

2010-01-12 Thread Adam Heath
Adam Heath wrote: > Adrian Crum wrote: >> Those public methods were created in anticipation of the Java 6 classes that >> will replace them. I can put them back and deprecate them instead. > > If they were never in an official release of ofbiz, then go ahead and > remove them. Heh, based on your

Re: svn commit: r898338 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilProperties.java

2010-01-12 Thread Adam Heath
Adrian Crum wrote: > Those public methods were created in anticipation of the Java 6 classes that > will replace them. I can put them back and deprecate them instead. If they were never in an official release of ofbiz, then go ahead and remove them.

Re: svn commit: r898338 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilProperties.java

2010-01-12 Thread Adrian Crum
Those public methods were created in anticipation of the Java 6 classes that will replace them. I can put them back and deprecate them instead. -Adrian --- On Tue, 1/12/10, Adam Heath wrote: > From: Adam Heath > Subject: Re: svn commit: r898338 - > /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/

Re: svn commit: r898338 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilProperties.java

2010-01-12 Thread Adam Heath
adri...@apache.org wrote: > Author: adrianc > Date: Tue Jan 12 14:24:36 2010 > New Revision: 898338 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=898338&view=rev > Log: > First pass at converting UtilProperties.java to Java 6, plus some small code > cleanups. Where exactly is the 1.6 syntax you are