Re: svn commit: r926912[...]

2021-12-05 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 06/12/2021 à 08:19, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : On 2010/03/24 07:02:51 Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > On Mar 24, 2010, at 4:55 AM, Scott Gray wrote: > > > > > My only concern is that we removed all author information when we moved to Apache and this feels very similar to it. I understand you're not

RE: Re: svn commit: r926912[...]

2021-12-05 Thread Jacques Le Roux
On 2010/03/24 07:02:51 Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > On Mar 24, 2010, at 4:55 AM, Scott Gray wrote: > > > > > My only concern is that we removed all author information when we moved to Apache and this feels very similar to it. I understand you're not claiming authorship but it does feel kind of impl

Re: svn commit: r926912 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base: concurrent/ concurrent/test/ conversion/ conversion/test/ json/ json/test/ lang/ lang/test/ util/ util/collections/ util/co

2010-03-23 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Mar 24, 2010, at 4:55 AM, Scott Gray wrote: > > My only concern is that we removed all author information when we moved to > Apache and this feels very similar to it. I understand you're not claiming > authorship but it does feel kind of implied. I agree with Scott, I don't like the idea o

Re: svn commit: r926912 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base: concurrent/ concurrent/test/ conversion/ conversion/test/ json/ json/test/ lang/ lang/test/ util/ util/collections/ util/co

2010-03-23 Thread Adam Heath
Adrian Crum wrote: > --- On Tue, 3/23/10, Adam Heath wrote: >> Adrian Crum wrote: Remember, annotations are easier to access programatically. >>> And automatically fix bad commits? >> What are you saying? > > I was saying something along the lines of "Gee Adam, an annotation that > ema

Re: svn commit: r926912 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base: concurrent/ concurrent/test/ conversion/ conversion/test/ json/ json/test/ lang/ lang/test/ util/ util/collections/ util/co

2010-03-23 Thread Adrian Crum
--- On Tue, 3/23/10, Adam Heath wrote: > Adrian Crum wrote: > >> Remember, annotations are easier to access > >> programatically. > > > > And automatically fix bad commits? > > What are you saying? I was saying something along the lines of "Gee Adam, an annotation that emails a list when somet

Re: svn commit: r926912 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base: concurrent/ concurrent/test/ conversion/ conversion/test/ json/ json/test/ lang/ lang/test/ util/ util/collections/ util/co

2010-03-23 Thread Adam Heath
Scott Gray wrote: > On 23/03/2010, at 9:46 PM, Adam Heath wrote: > >> Scott Gray wrote: >>> On 23/03/2010, at 9:37 PM, Adam Heath wrote: >>> Scott Gray wrote: > This seems important, could you explain how it works a little more? There was a thread about this recently, where I announc

Re: svn commit: r926912 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base: concurrent/ concurrent/test/ conversion/ conversion/test/ json/ json/test/ lang/ lang/test/ util/ util/collections/ util/co

2010-03-23 Thread Adam Heath
Adrian Crum wrote: > Maybe there could be some indirection where the annotation could contain a > mailing list group or some such. It already does. The default address is d...@ofbiz.apache.org. Go read the commit again. You can have a single email address, but multiple names.

Re: svn commit: r926912 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base: concurrent/ concurrent/test/ conversion/ conversion/test/ json/ json/test/ lang/ lang/test/ util/ util/collections/ util/co

2010-03-23 Thread Adam Heath
Adrian Crum wrote: >> Remember, annotations are easier to access >> programatically. > > And automatically fix bad commits? What are you saying?

Re: svn commit: r926912 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base: concurrent/ concurrent/test/ conversion/ conversion/test/ json/ json/test/ lang/ lang/test/ util/ util/collections/ util/co

2010-03-23 Thread Adrian Crum
--- On Tue, 3/23/10, Scott Gray wrote: > From: Scott Gray > Subject: Re: svn commit: r926912 - in > /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base: concurrent/ concurrent/test/ > conversion/ conversion/test/ json/ json/test/ lang/ lang/test/ util/ > util/collections/ util/c

Re: svn commit: r926912 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base: concurrent/ concurrent/test/ conversion/ conversion/test/ json/ json/test/ lang/ lang/test/ util/ util/collections/ util/co

2010-03-23 Thread Adrian Crum
--- On Tue, 3/23/10, Adam Heath wrote: > From: Adam Heath > Subject: Re: svn commit: r926912 - in > /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base: concurrent/ concurrent/test/ > conversion/ conversion/test/ json/ json/test/ lang/ lang/test/ util/ > util/collections/ util/c

Re: svn commit: r926912 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base: concurrent/ concurrent/test/ conversion/ conversion/test/ json/ json/test/ lang/ lang/test/ util/ util/collections/ util/co

2010-03-23 Thread Scott Gray
On 23/03/2010, at 9:46 PM, Adam Heath wrote: > Scott Gray wrote: >> On 23/03/2010, at 9:37 PM, Adam Heath wrote: >> >>> Scott Gray wrote: This seems important, could you explain how it works a little more? >>> There was a thread about this recently, where I announced which >>> classes had fu

Re: svn commit: r926912 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base: concurrent/ concurrent/test/ conversion/ conversion/test/ json/ json/test/ lang/ lang/test/ util/ util/collections/ util/co

2010-03-23 Thread Adam Heath
Scott Gray wrote: > On 23/03/2010, at 9:37 PM, Adam Heath wrote: > >> Scott Gray wrote: >>> This seems important, could you explain how it works a little more? >> There was a thread about this recently, where I announced which >> classes had full coverage. This annotation just means that the >> p

Re: svn commit: r926912 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base: concurrent/ concurrent/test/ conversion/ conversion/test/ json/ json/test/ lang/ lang/test/ util/ util/collections/ util/co

2010-03-23 Thread Scott Gray
On 23/03/2010, at 9:37 PM, Adam Heath wrote: > Scott Gray wrote: >> This seems important, could you explain how it works a little more? > > There was a thread about this recently, where I announced which > classes had full coverage. This annotation just means that the > person(s) listed in the a

Re: svn commit: r926912 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base: concurrent/ concurrent/test/ conversion/ conversion/test/ json/ json/test/ lang/ lang/test/ util/ util/collections/ util/co

2010-03-23 Thread Adam Heath
Scott Gray wrote: > This seems important, could you explain how it works a little more? There was a thread about this recently, where I announced which classes had full coverage. This annotation just means that the person(s) listed in the annotation are monitoring the source. That means that tho

Re: svn commit: r926912 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base: concurrent/ concurrent/test/ conversion/ conversion/test/ json/ json/test/ lang/ lang/test/ util/ util/collections/ util/co

2010-03-23 Thread Scott Gray
This seems important, could you explain how it works a little more? Thanks Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 23/03/2010, at 9:17 PM, doo...@apache.org wrote: > Author: doogie > Date: Wed Mar 24 03:16:50 2010 > New Revision: 926912 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=92691