Re: [RELEASE]: proposal for our next release AOO 4.1

2014-01-06 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 12/28/13 7:59 PM, jan i wrote: > On 28 December 2013 19:52, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Andrea Pescetti >> wrote: >>> On 17/12/2013 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: I don't know what others think but based on this new information I would like to move my proposed

Re: [RELEASE]: proposal for our next release AOO 4.1

2013-12-29 Thread Yuzhen Fan
I update the AOO 4.1 Release Planning [1] to sync the schedule in discussion here, it is mainly based on Juergen's proposal on Dec 17 with QE's comments. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Release+Planning On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 2:59 AM, jan i wrote: > On 28 Dece

Re: [RELEASE]: proposal for our next release AOO 4.1

2013-12-28 Thread jan i
On 28 December 2013 19:52, Rob Weir wrote: > On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Andrea Pescetti > wrote: > > On 17/12/2013 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> > >> I don't know what others think but based on this new information I would > >> like to move my proposed schedule a little bit. > >> Jan 24, 201

Re: [RELEASE]: proposal for our next release AOO 4.1

2013-12-28 Thread Rob Weir
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 17/12/2013 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> >> I don't know what others think but based on this new information I would >> like to move my proposed schedule a little bit. >> Jan 24, 2014 feature freeze >> Jan 27, 2014 translation freeze ... >>

Re: [RELEASE]: proposal for our next release AOO 4.1

2013-12-28 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 17/12/2013 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: I don't know what others think but based on this new information I would like to move my proposed schedule a little bit. Jan 24, 2014 feature freeze Jan 27, 2014 translation freeze ... Mar 21, 2014 RC1? Apr 1, 2014 GA? (I like this date if possible) In gener

Re: [RELEASE]: proposal for our next release AOO 4.1

2013-12-18 Thread Yuzhen Fan
>Feb ??, 2014 feature FVT finish (I know in China is public holiday as well from Jan 31 - Feb 7) QA needs about 70 PD to complete the left 1061 executions (total 1061, suppose 15 executions per day per QA volunteer being concentrated on this work) on Writer(140), Calc(330) and Impress(591). We sta

Re: [RELEASE]: proposal for our next release AOO 4.1

2013-12-17 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 12/17/13 3:54 PM, FR web forum wrote: >> no, as far as I know their are no UI changes. I plan an update of the >> released languages and new languages based on the aoo40 to integrate fixes. > I thought that new features like Accessibility Support could be documented in > help file. > So, we hav

Re: [RELEASE]: proposal for our next release AOO 4.1

2013-12-17 Thread FR web forum
>no, as far as I know their are no UI changes. I plan an update of the >released languages and new languages based on the aoo40 to integrate fixes. I thought that new features like Accessibility Support could be documented in help file. So, we have missing strings: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/s

Re: [RELEASE]: proposal for our next release AOO 4.1

2013-12-17 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 12/17/13 3:18 PM, jan i wrote: > On 17 December 2013 15:12, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> On 12/17/13 3:00 PM, FR web forum wrote: >>> Hello, >>> Jan 27, 2014 translation freeze >>> Did you set an aoo41 folder in Pootle? >> >> no, as far as I know their are no UI changes. I plan an update of

Re: [RELEASE]: proposal for our next release AOO 4.1

2013-12-17 Thread jan i
On 17 December 2013 15:12, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 12/17/13 3:00 PM, FR web forum wrote: > > Hello, > > > >> Jan 27, 2014 translation freeze > > Did you set an aoo41 folder in Pootle? > > no, as far as I know their are no UI changes. I plan an update of the > released languages and new languag

Re: [RELEASE]: proposal for our next release AOO 4.1

2013-12-17 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 12/17/13 3:00 PM, FR web forum wrote: > Hello, > >> Jan 27, 2014 translation freeze > Did you set an aoo41 folder in Pootle? no, as far as I know their are no UI changes. I plan an update of the released languages and new languages based on the aoo40 to integrate fixes. Ideally people who mad

Re: [RELEASE]: proposal for our next release AOO 4.1

2013-12-17 Thread jan i
On 17 December 2013 15:00, FR web forum wrote: > Hello, > > >Jan 27, 2014 translation freeze > Did you set an aoo41 folder in Pootle? > no need to make a new project, just use the existing one. rgds jan I. > > - > To unsubscri

Re: [RELEASE]: proposal for our next release AOO 4.1

2013-12-17 Thread FR web forum
Hello, >Jan 27, 2014 translation freeze Did you set an aoo41 folder in Pootle? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [RELEASE]: proposal for our next release AOO 4.1

2013-12-17 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
Hi, well it seems that I was a little bit to optimistic or do I need a break? I don't know probably both but I talked with the developers in my direct surrounding field and taking the Christmas break, vacation etc. into account we believe that my proposal was a little bit to optimistic. I don't k

Re: [RELEASE]: proposal for our next release AOO 4.1

2013-12-10 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 12/9/13 7:45 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:41 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> some time ago we have discussed a language only release on base of >> 4.0.1. And even a language release requires a lot of work. Until today I >> see 3 potential languages ready which is not en

Re: [RELEASE]: proposal for our next release AOO 4.1

2013-12-09 Thread Rob Weir
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:41 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > some time ago we have discussed a language only release on base of > 4.0.1. And even a language release requires a lot of work. Until today I > see 3 potential languages ready which is not enough from my perspective. +1 > But on the

Re: [RELEASE]: proposal for our next release AOO 4.1

2013-12-09 Thread Kay Schenk
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > some time ago we have discussed a language only release on base of > 4.0.1. And even a language release requires a lot of work. Until today I > see 3 potential languages ready which is not enough from my perspective. > But on the oth