Re: cvs commit: modperl-site index.html

2001-05-21 Thread Gerald Richter
I have now removed the section about "Embedding Perl into HTML" and renamed the AppServer section to Application Servers/Toolkits/Embedding Perl into HTML/XML publishing running with mod_perl also I have sorted the modules in alphabeticaly order. I hope this is ok now, if not we can change it a

apache_1.3.20 and win32

2001-05-21 Thread Randy Kobes
Hi, mod_perl built with apache_1.3.20 on Win32 has a warning about redefining isnan, similar to warnings a few versions ago about stat, etc. The attached diff on the cvs mod_perl silences those warnings. best regards, randy kobes win32.diff

Re: application server

2001-05-21 Thread brian moseley
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Brian Aker wrote: > Nope, the opposite. A year or two ago I was at the perl > conference and noticed sun passing out a marketing flier > as to why you should write web apps in Java. They > specifically defined servlet as a persistent component > that could have a persistent c

Re: application server

2001-05-21 Thread Brian Aker
brian moseley wrote: > > On Sun, 20 May 2001, Brian Aker wrote: > > > FWIW I refer to any perl code that is persistent and is > > making use of mod_perl as a servlet. > > "servlet" is a specific term coined by sun referring to a a > specific component in the servlet api. you're just being > unc

Re: application server

2001-05-21 Thread Gerald Richter
> > the end goal of a application server is to simplify the > entire process of developing and deploying a complete > application, not just one part of it. we're really talking > about a whole different order of magnitude. > I agree to you with this goal (and that's what I done partly, for databa

Re: application server

2001-05-21 Thread brian moseley
On Sun, 20 May 2001, Brian Aker wrote: > FWIW I refer to any perl code that is persistent and is > making use of mod_perl as a servlet. "servlet" is a specific term coined by sun referring to a a specific component in the servlet api. you're just being uncreative and confusing. ---

Re: application server

2001-05-21 Thread brian moseley
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Gerald Richter wrote: > I agree to Matt, there is nothing missing for an > application server, it's mainly a matter of installation > and documentation, so for people not familar with CPAN > it's maybe hard to find. you're both missing my point. sure there are lots of compon