On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Stas wrote:
>
> Style police (should have pointed it out earlier):
>
> > +{
> > +local $| = 0;
> > +ok 9 == $r->print("buffered\n");
> > +ok 0 == $r->print();
> > +local $| = 1;
> > +ok 13 == $r->print('n','o','t',' ','b','u','f','f','e'
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Stas wrote:
> The actual test is the smallest example I can come up with. What I want
> is to create two identical .pm files, with different contents and make
> sure that vh interpreter loads a file different from the main
> interpreter. The test passes if each one fetche
Style police (should have pointed it out earlier):
> +{
> +local $| = 0;
> +ok 9 == $r->print("buffered\n");
> +ok 0 == $r->print();
> +local $| = 1;
> +ok 13 == $r->print('n','o','t',' ','b','u','f','f','e','r','e','d',"\n");
> +}
> +
shouldn't
Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>>OK, here is the patch that:
>>
>>- adds the writefile sub to genfile+throw content in
>>- adds a scan for APACHE_TEST_CONFIGURE and its execution
>>
>
> those both look good, how about if you go ahead commit both as separate
>
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> OK, here is the patch that:
>
> - adds the writefile sub to genfile+throw content in
> - adds a scan for APACHE_TEST_CONFIGURE and its execution
those both look good, how about if you go ahead commit both as separate
patches?
> - implements the Perl
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Philippe M . Chiasson wrote:
> Right now, my patch implements filtering on the modperl side with apr_tables to
> hold the filter list, but the best solution would be to call vdo directly, but
> I've read in many places that there is no way to fake a va_list to pass along
> t
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Philippe M . Chiasson wrote:
> The only reason is that I am slowly starting to understand how all the XS
> stuff gets discovered/parsed/written, and I have to play around with cut and
> paste ;-) I am starting to understand how it works better every day and I promised
> Sta
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Philippe M . Chiasson wrote:
> > > Can you make sure it's also avaliable thru
rsync://cvs.apache.org/modperl-docs ?
> >
> > Who is supposed to do that? Did you check that it doesn't work already?
> > I'd think that these things happen automatically, since it's a generic
> > l
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 08:04:14PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Philippe M . Chiasson wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 07:39:17PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > > [This message is crossposted to all mod_perl lists. It is possible that
> > > we will concentrate all mod_perl
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Philippe M . Chiasson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 07:39:17PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > [This message is crossposted to all mod_perl lists. It is possible that
> > we will concentrate all mod_perl projects docs in one place.]
> >
> > A new cvs rep and two mailing list
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 07:39:17PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> [This message is crossposted to all mod_perl lists. It is possible that
> we will concentrate all mod_perl projects docs in one place.]
>
> A new cvs rep and two mailing lists were created and we're starting to
> commit shorlty to thi
[This message is crossposted to all mod_perl lists. It is possible that
we will concentrate all mod_perl projects docs in one place.]
A new cvs rep and two mailing lists were created and we're starting to
commit shorlty to this repository shortly after this announcement.
If you are interested in
My bad, sorry, works all right now. Don't mind me anymore ;-p
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 04:35:00PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Philippe M . Chiasson wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 02:04:13AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > >
> > > OK, here is the patch that:
> > >
> > > -
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Philippe M . Chiasson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 02:04:13AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >
> > OK, here is the patch that:
> >
> > - adds the writefile sub to genfile+throw content in
> > - adds a scan for APACHE_TEST_CONFIGURE and its execution
> > - implements the Perl
14 matches
Mail list logo
