Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/ModPerl-Registry/t .cvsignore

2001-10-17 Thread Stas Bekman
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 12:35:06PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> >>>stas01/10/17 21:25:12 >>> >>> Modified:ModPerl-Registry/t .cvsignore >>> Added: ModPerl-Registry .cvsignore >>> Log: >>> - cvsignore files >>> >>

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/ModPerl-Registry/t .cvsignore

2001-10-17 Thread Philippe M. Chiasson
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 12:35:06PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > stas01/10/17 21:25:12 > > > > Modified:ModPerl-Registry/t .cvsignore > > Added: ModPerl-Registry .cvsignore > > Log: > > - cvsignore files > > > Any idea why I don't get the

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/ModPerl-Registry/t .cvsignore

2001-10-17 Thread Stas Bekman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > stas01/10/17 21:25:12 > > Modified:ModPerl-Registry/t .cvsignore > Added: ModPerl-Registry .cvsignore > Log: > - cvsignore files Any idea why I don't get the Submitted by: and other commit headers while doing cvs commit under this dir?

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0 Makefile.PL

2001-10-17 Thread Stas Bekman
Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > > >>I don't have any installed, but I don't understand what's the problem? >>what is the problem with 'make clean'? How can I reproduce the problem? >> > > when i had done 'make clean', and 'perl Makefile.PL && make' not all

Re: useragent multiplicity

2001-10-17 Thread Stas Bekman
Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Vivek Khera wrote: > > >>>"DM" == Doug MacEachern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> >>DM> first-in or first-putback first-out. >> >>First-in is different than first-putback. >> > > right and the interpreter pool does both. when you request

Re: useragent multiplicity

2001-10-17 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Vivek Khera wrote: > > "DM" == Doug MacEachern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > DM> first-in or first-putback first-out. > > First-in is different than first-putback. right and the interpreter pool does both. when you request an interpreter you might get one that's ne

Re: useragent multiplicity

2001-10-17 Thread Vivek Khera
> "DM" == Doug MacEachern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DM> first-in or first-putback first-out. First-in is different than first-putback. First-putback seems to me to be last-in. I think Stas is right. The mechanism you described is LIFO. -

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0 Makefile.PL

2001-10-17 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > I don't have any installed, but I don't understand what's the problem? > what is the problem with 'make clean'? How can I reproduce the problem? when i had done 'make clean', and 'perl Makefile.PL && make' not all of the .pm's and .so's were ending up

Re: useragent multiplicity

2001-10-17 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > looks good, but it's quite big for copy-n-pasteing into each test that > needs this functionality and quite a few tests may want to use it. Do > you think it'd be a good idea to somehow move this into the core > functionality? sure, i just hacked tog

Re: useragent multiplicity

2001-10-17 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > but isn't it the definition of 'lifo'? i don't think so. if anything close it would be fifo. but since items are taken from the front of the list and putback at the front the of the list, then likely taken off again before items at the end, its more l

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0 Makefile.PL

2001-10-17 Thread Stas Bekman
Doug MacEachern wrote: > stas, as i suspected, this patch does not work. please try with 'make > clean' and without any modperl-2.0 modules installed into the default > @INC. I don't have any installed, but I don't understand what's the problem? what is the problem with 'make clean'? How can