On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
>
> >./perlmain.o: In function `xs_init':
> >./perlmain.o(.text+0x9f): undefined reference to `boot_libapreq'
>
> haven't had a change to digest all this, but you should rm the libapreq.a
> from y
On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
>./perlmain.o: In function `xs_init':
>./perlmain.o(.text+0x9f): undefined reference to `boot_libapreq'
haven't had a change to digest all this, but you should rm the libapreq.a
from your site_perl tree to fix this problem.
as for linking lib
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > -c) be a form that was nothing like 1.xx (e.g. Apache::Leek)
> > +c) be a form that was nothing like 1.xx (e.g. Apache::Leak)
>
>
> or was it Peek?
probably Leak, since Peek isn't in the main modperl dist.
--
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> todo/missing_old_features.txt is talking about these not ported yet core
> modules:
>
> - Apache::File, Apache::Util
>
> can I start porting these? Or do you have some special plans about these?
>
> Also the todo file says:
>
> - see also: xs/maps/ap
Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>
>>this patch implements the PerlINC wrapper which does:
>>s/PerlSwitches -Ilib=foo/PerlINC foo/
>>
>
> if we add a new directive like this i think it should be a wrapper around
> what 'Perl{Set,Pass}Env PERL5LIB' would do, th
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> ap_server_root_relative return the dir incliding the trailing / if
> fname==NULL, which is bad.
need to do some research here:
- what does 1.x do? if adds trailing /, then leave it alone
if no trailing /, bug is in apache-2.0
-
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> this patch implements the PerlINC wrapper which does:
> s/PerlSwitches -Ilib=foo/PerlINC foo/
if we add a new directive like this i think it should be a wrapper around
what 'Perl{Set,Pass}Env PERL5LIB' would do, that is:
- unshift @INC
- work per-direct
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> Following Stas comments, here is a revised patch.
thanks, that's in.
> One question left though, when we have an accessor method like
>
> $r->pnotes('key','value');
>
> Should it return the old or the new values ?
it should do whatever 1.x
Following Stas comments, here is a revised patch.
One question left though, when we have an accessor method like
$r->pnotes('key','value');
Should it return the old or the new values ?
I ask because I think it's inconsistently implemented...
/home/gozer/sources/mod_perl2/deps/perl-12948/bin/
