On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 12:41:22PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> >>So probably a similar suite but explicitly for mod_perl would be nice.
> >>
> >
> > Oh, not at all. I am running smoke tests on my own computer, and I just
> > figured that I could hack up the p5p smoke test script and adapt it
>
>>So probably a similar suite but explicitly for mod_perl would be nice.
>>
>
> Oh, not at all. I am running smoke tests on my own computer, and I just
> figured that I could hack up the p5p smoke test script and adapt it
> to inculde mod_perl build & tests.
>
> But since there are only a hand
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 11:37:02AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
>
> > I wonder if this could be:
> > 1. Usefull
>
>
> sure, to run all tests with various build opts.
>
>
> > 2. Worthwile to try and include mod_perl build and test in the smoke test suite.
>
>
> not
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> I wonder if this could be:
> 1. Usefull
sure, to run all tests with various build opts.
> 2. Worthwile to try and include mod_perl build and test in the smoke test suite.
not in the suite that used by p5p people. They will have to keep the
httpd and mod_perl s
Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>
>>I've tested, it has a trailing /
>>
>
> then changing it to not have a trailing / could break people's
> existing code.
>
>
>>Do you think this patch makes sense? or should this be handled on the
>>apr_filepath_merge l
I wonder if this could be:
1. Usefull
2. Worthwile to try and include mod_perl build and test in the smoke test suite.
--
Philippe M. Chiasson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Extropia's Resident System Guru
http://www.eXtropia.com/
/* When we have more time, we can teach the penguin to say
* "B
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> I've tested, it has a trailing /
then changing it to not have a trailing / could break people's
existing code.
> Do you think this patch makes sense? or should this be handled on the
> apr_filepath_merge level?
no, ap_server_root_relative() shouldn'
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 03:51:33PM -0600, Salvador Ortiz Garcia wrote:
>
> Haven't seen the original post (I'm in troubles with my server), but the
> standard solution when building an static perl extension without MakeMaker
> trying to link in other extensions is:
>
> $ perl Makefile.PL INCLUDE
Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>
>>ap_server_root_relative return the dir incliding the trailing / if
>>fname==NULL, which is bad.
>>
>
> need to do some research here:
> - what does 1.x do? if adds trailing /, then leave it alone
I've tested, it has a
