Hi,
I should update the mod_perl-2 ppm package, but am still
having trouble getting it to work on my system with perl-5.6.1.
With perl-5.8 I don't have such problems, and with the current
cvs sources all tests pass. So I was thinking, until ActiveState
releases a perl-5.8, of making available a
With perl-5.8 on Win32 and mod_perl-1.27, I get an error
in compiling src/modules/perl/Constants.c about errno
being undeclared. The attached diff allows things
to build and all tests pass. I also tested it with
perl-5.6.1.
best regards,
randy
Index: src/modules/perl/apache_inc.h
=
--On Saturday, June 15, 2002 10:23 AM -0700 Doug MacEachern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Doug MacEachern wrote:
>
>> how did '-undefined suppress' end up in your ldflags? they should only
>> be in lddflags.
>
> still curious if you have an answer. but i edited my Config.
The URL
http://perl.apache.org/dist/mod_perl-1.99_03.tar.gz
has entered CPAN as
file: $CPAN/authors/id/D/DO/DOUGM/mod_perl-1.99_03.tar.gz
size: 391039 bytes
md5: 36f7beae83234a20217096046e3d73ff
Changes since 1.99_02:
win32 fix for the global Apache->request object to make sure it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 09:49:47AM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> can't read your message. could you say again without pgp?
Yeah, I forgot to patch the latest mutt to not do stupid PGP/MIME. Let's try
again
- -Begin-
Has anyone else
todo is the not the same as disabling. now anybody running RC1 (and there
is not RC2 yet), gets the ugly "unexpectedly succeeded" messages.
disabling means not running the failing tests at all, can you please do
that?
On 15 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> stas2002/06/15 12:08:21
>
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> how did '-undefined suppress' end up in your ldflags? they should only be
> in lddflags.
still curious if you have an answer. but i edited my Config.pm by hand
and added these flags to see it break. then applied a similar patch to
Apache::Build
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
> According to Nick I-S I need to do parts of the IO layer differently.
> I'm working on it.
ok, unless you plan to have it done in the next hour or so, please disable
the failing tests.
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, R Blake wrote:
> ld='cc', ldflags ='-flat_namespace -undefined suppress -L/usr/local/lib
> -L/usr/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -L/usr/local/BerkeleyDB/lib'
how did '-undefined suppress' end up in your ldflags? they should only be
in lddflags.
on the osx box i test on, ldflags
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Stephen Clouse wrote:
[NON-Text Body part not included]
can't read your message. could you say again without pgp?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL P
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
> what's the plan for PerlCleanupHandler in 2.0? (the usual question of
> whether to document it or not :)
plan is to add support for it.
> I understand that in 2.0 since now we have a pool that gets destroyed at
> the end of each request, we simply use
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
> todo/api.txt
> -
> $r->log_reason:
> should be simple, see modperl_log.h
>
> Doug are we planning on implementing this one in-core, and the recent
> addition of the compat implementation was only tmp?
dunno. somebody needs to figure out why
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
> In the compat doc, I need more info regarding ->request() method variations.
>
> In 1.x we have:
>
> Apache->request()
>
> In 2.x this method is deprecated because of the overhead in the threaded
> MPMs.
>
> What's the alternative for modules like CGI
> > the problem was fixed in bleedperl #11536/11553
> > modperl-2.0 has a workaround for the problem when 5.6.1 is being used
> > (see
> > code within #ifdef MP_REFGEN_FIXUP in mod_perl.c). might consider
> > adding
> > it for for 1.27
fyi - i did not put this workaround into 1.27 and no plan
14 matches
Mail list logo
