Re: pumpkin for mod_perl 1.0?

2003-01-21 Thread Stas Bekman
Randy Kobes wrote: Just so as to not give the impression that this would be a lonelier job than the Maytag repairman ...:) There's a few (small) things for Win32 that I've gathered over the last little while - a couple bugs in the build process, and some things to get rid of some warnings - that

Re: pumpkin for mod_perl 1.0?

2003-01-21 Thread Stas Bekman
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 11:39, Stas Bekman wrote: Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: [...] Doug will still handle the release management. What we need help with, is maintaining the STATUS file and verifying and following up on submitted patches so not to discourage contribu

Re: [mp2] make test errors w/. threadmutex, push_handlers

2003-01-21 Thread Stas Bekman
Nick Tonkin wrote: Might I suggest the following messages instead: Good input, Nick apr/threadmutex..skipped test skipped: threads not installed or 'APR::ThreadMutex' not found Now it'll say: apr/threadmutex1..0 # skipped: Apache/APR was built without threads support er

Re: [mp2] config: $Listen won't listen.

2003-01-21 Thread Philippe M. Chiasson
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 08:03, Stas Bekman wrote: > Dmitri Tikhonov wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I just upgraded to 1.99_08, and it lets me do all my old > > configurations. Except for one. > > > > When I try to do something like > > > > > > push @Listen, 80; > > > > # or this: > >

Re: pumpkin for mod_perl 1.0?

2003-01-21 Thread Randy Kobes
On 22 Jan 2003, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: > On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 09:08, Stas Bekman wrote: [ .. ] > > Doug will still handle the release management. What we need > > help with, is maintaining the STATUS file and verifying and > > following up on submitted patches so not to discourage > > contri

Re: pumpkin for mod_perl 1.0?

2003-01-21 Thread Philippe M. Chiasson
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 11:39, Stas Bekman wrote: > Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: > [...] > >>Doug will still handle the release management. What we need help with, is > >>maintaining the STATUS file and verifying and following up on submitted > >>patches so not to discourage contributions. (again tal

Re: pumpkin for mod_perl 1.0?

2003-01-21 Thread Stas Bekman
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: [...] Doug will still handle the release management. What we need help with, is maintaining the STATUS file and verifying and following up on submitted patches so not to discourage contributions. (again talking mod_perl 1.0 here). Isn't Geoffery taking care of this a

Re: [mp2] make test errors w/. threadmutex, push_handlers

2003-01-21 Thread Nick Tonkin
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Stas Bekman wrote: > Nick Tonkin wrote: > > > But still: > > > > directive/setupenv...ok > > error/push_handlers..# Failed test 1 in error/push_handlers.t at > > line 14 > > error/push_handlers..FAILED tes

Re: pumpkin for mod_perl 1.0?

2003-01-21 Thread Philippe M. Chiasson
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 09:08, Stas Bekman wrote: > Stas Bekman wrote: > > Once in a while we get mod_perl 1.0 patches posted from the kind folks. > > I'm trying to cope with 2.0 and I'm not very familiar with 1.0 guts, so > > I commit only things that I know about. Doug is too busy at work, so he

Re: pumpkin for mod_perl 1.0?

2003-01-21 Thread Stas Bekman
Stas Bekman wrote: Once in a while we get mod_perl 1.0 patches posted from the kind folks. I'm trying to cope with 2.0 and I'm not very familiar with 1.0 guts, so I commit only things that I know about. Doug is too busy at work, so he is not here to do that. Therefore we need someone to take ca

pumpkin for mod_perl 1.0?

2003-01-21 Thread Stas Bekman
Once in a while we get mod_perl 1.0 patches posted from the kind folks. I'm trying to cope with 2.0 and I'm not very familiar with 1.0 guts, so I commit only things that I know about. Doug is too busy at work, so he is not here to do that. Therefore we need someone to take care of those infreque

Re: rfc: new filtering APIs

2003-01-21 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: I gave this some more thought and I think that this approach would be too ineffective. I think if we ever need only *one* filter_init function per package (filter), we could have a special name for it, similar to INIT, BEGIN, etc. e.g.: sub FILTER_INIT { # } T

Re: [mp2] make test errors w/. threadmutex, push_handlers

2003-01-21 Thread Stas Bekman
Nick Tonkin wrote: But still: directive/setupenv...ok error/push_handlers..# Failed test 1 in error/push_handlers.t at line 14 error/push_handlers..FAILED test 1 Failed 1/1 tests, 0.0

Re: DBI/mod_perl2 failure

2003-01-21 Thread Randy Kobes
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Daryl Lee wrote: > Problem solved. The root cause was staring me in my face and I missed it. > Under mod_perl, the connection attempt was through /tmp/mysql.sock, but > (for reasons that totally escape me) all other communication with mysql is > through /var/lib/mysql/mysql.s

Re: [mp2] make test errors w/. threadmutex, push_handlers

2003-01-21 Thread Nick Tonkin
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Stas Bekman wrote: > Nick Tonkin wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > > > >>Nick Tonkin wrote: > >> > >apr/threadmutex..FAILED tests 1-3 > > Failed 3/3 tests, 0.00% okay > [...] > > Thanks Nick an

Re: rfc: new filtering APIs

2003-01-21 Thread Geoffrey Young
I gave this some more thought and I think that this approach would be too ineffective. I think if we ever need only *one* filter_init function per package (filter), we could have a special name for it, similar to INIT, BEGIN, etc. e.g.: sub FILTER_INIT { # } This will make the lookup

Re: DBI/mod_perl2 failure

2003-01-21 Thread Daryl Lee
Problem solved. The root cause was staring me in my face and I missed it. Under mod_perl, the connection attempt was through /tmp/mysql.sock, but (for reasons that totally escape me) all other communication with mysql is through /var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock. A symlink at /tmp pointing to the correct