On onsdag, feb 12, 2003, at 00:57 Europe/Stockholm, Stas Bekman wrote:
A.Bergman wrote:
On fredag, feb 7, 2003, at 01:13 Europe/Stockholm, A. Bergman wrote:
Getting some weird coredumps, recompile with debugging, and
breakpoint on Perl_croak gave me this.
[...]
That stack trace is bogus, cur
Nathan Byrd wrote:
[...]
fields Pragma
-
Advantages:
* More straightforward approach
* Less code to add to module
Disadvantages:
* Based on pseudo-hashes - may have problems with reloading, etc
* Unknown whether it changes performance (due to "typed lexical"
limitation of pragma)
* Fo
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 18:10, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Are there any other folks out there that care about the implementation
> details? That's a pure Perl afterall. It'd be nice to hear more opinions.
>
[...]
> > I was referring to the fact that AFAIK the fields pragma is currently
> > (with 5.61 an
Are there any other folks out there that care about the implementation
details? That's a pure Perl afterall. It'd be nice to hear more opinions.
Nathan Byrd wrote:
[...]
2) Anything that looks like pseudo-hashes scares me. :-) Pseudo-hashes
seem to be in flux, and as a result I went with the mo
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
Currently there is no way to convert from apr_finfo_t to struct finfo.
But, at least, here is a finfo patch that works.
Drawbacks for now is that it will resort to a stat() call each time
used, and can't be assigned to like you used to be able to do in 1.x
land (was
ayhan wrote:
Thanks for your prompt response, Stas.
We've pulled the cvs version yesterday.
Will do some tests and get back to you.
BTW, are you aware of any recent changes that would
invalidate the following piece of code :
$filter->next->pass_brigade($bb_ctx);
This line worked up until 1
A.Bergman wrote:
On fredag, feb 7, 2003, at 01:13 Europe/Stockholm, A. Bergman wrote:
Getting some weird coredumps, recompile with debugging, and breakpoint
on Perl_croak gave me this.
[...]
That stack trace is bogus, current theory is that when perl loads a xs
module there is stack corrupti
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
Stas, can you please resend your patch, it got mangled or something.
I wish mozilla-mail wasn't mangling copy-n-paste :( Attached the patch.
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH --> Just Another mod_perl
Thanks for your prompt response, Stas.
We've pulled the cvs version yesterday.
Will do some tests and get back to you.
BTW, are you aware of any recent changes that would
invalidate the following piece of code :
$filter->next->pass_brigade($bb_ctx);
This line worked up until 1.99.08
On fredag, feb 7, 2003, at 01:13 Europe/Stockholm, A. Bergman wrote:
Getting some weird coredumps, recompile with debugging, and breakpoint
on Perl_croak gave me this.
#0 Perl_croak (pat=0xae7ca0 "Assertion ((sv)->sv_flags &
(0x2000|0x4000|0x8000)) failed: file \"%s\", line %d"
Make sure to reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;-)
Philippe M. Chiasson /gozer\@(cpan|ectoplasm)\.org/ 88C3A5A5
(122FF51B/C634E37B)
http://gozer.ectoplasm.org/F9BF E0C2 480E 7680 1AE5 3631 CB32 A107
88C3 A5A5
Q: It is im
Currently there is no way to convert from apr_finfo_t to struct finfo.
But, at least, here is a finfo patch that works.
Drawbacks for now is that it will resort to a stat() call each time
used, and can't be assigned to like you used to be able to do in 1.x
land (was this feature used at all?)
$
Stas, can you please resend your patch, it got mangled or something.
Doesn't apply at all for me ;-(
On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 15:35, Stas Bekman wrote:
> I'm trying to take care of this todo item:
>
> -Apache::perl_hook:
> -should have this or something check if PerlOptions allows the given
> -han
13 matches
Mail list logo
