* Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> but INCLUDES detects a recursion:
> >>
> >
> > There is a config setting which can increase the number of redirects
> > allowed. as far as dynamic vs static.. mod-include doesn't know what is
> > underneath it. I belive the recursion is set by d
Geoffrey Young wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
geoff 2003/11/25 10:56:34
Modified:xs/maps apache_functions.map modperl_functions.map
xs/tables/current/ModPerl FunctionTable.pm
Added: t/response/TestAPI mpm_query.pm show_mpm.pm
xs/Apache/MPM Apache__M
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> geoff 2003/11/25 10:56:34
>
> Modified:xs/maps apache_functions.map modperl_functions.map
>xs/tables/current/ModPerl FunctionTable.pm
> Added: t/response/TestAPI mpm_query.pm show_mpm.pm
>xs/Apache/MPM Apache__MPM.h
Vivek Khera wrote:
I think that the docs for freebsd should note that the shared size
computation is totally incorrect -- as it is now it only gives you the
shared text segment, which is essentially only the compiled C code
parts of perl.
Yes. Here's a complete answer on the subject from Doug Stei
> "PH" == Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PH> Vivek Khera wrote:
>> So, either it is fixed in freebsd 4.9 or fixed in perl 5.8.2.
>> SizeLimit does seem to work with these latest versions.
PH> Glad to hear it. I suspect it is fixed by the FreeBSD upgrade, because
PH> the issue is
Vivek Khera wrote:
So, either it is fixed in freebsd 4.9 or fixed in perl 5.8.2.
SizeLimit does seem to work with these latest versions.
Glad to hear it. I suspect it is fixed by the FreeBSD upgrade, because
the issue is that process size calculations are difficult on FreeBSD.
Maybe getrusage()
