Re: [mp2 patch] getting APR to work w/o modperl

2004-05-06 Thread Stas Bekman
Remind me please what is mod_perl.lib? The file with symbols listing? -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH --> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [mp2 patch] getting APR to work w/o modperl

2004-05-06 Thread Randy Kobes
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: > Randy Kobes wrote: > > On Wed, 5 May 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > >>I did some more tweaks and this time generated the source > >>scan. Here is the updated version: > >>http://apache.org/~stas/apr-ext.patch > > > > Thanks for that, Stas! There's a couple

Re: [mp2 patch] getting APR to work w/o modperl

2004-05-06 Thread Stas Bekman
Randy Kobes wrote: On Wed, 5 May 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: I did some more tweaks and this time generated the source scan. Here is the updated version: http://apache.org/~stas/apr-ext.patch Thanks for that, Stas! There's a couple of things on Win32 (I'm not sure how specific they are to Win32):

Re: [mp2 patch] getting APR to work w/o modperl

2004-05-06 Thread Randy Kobes
On Wed, 5 May 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: > I did some more tweaks and this time generated the source > scan. Here is the updated version: > http://apache.org/~stas/apr-ext.patch Thanks for that, Stas! There's a couple of things on Win32 (I'm not sure how specific they are to Win32): - the WriteMak

Re: [Patch mp2] Statically compiling mod_perl without touching httpd

2004-05-06 Thread Stas Bekman
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: If I remember correctly there were too many problems with that approach. And if that's the case. We may need to first install httpd, then test modperl and then install modperl. If there are no problems, then modperl's make install should install h

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/t/protocol/TestProtocol echo_filter.pm echo_timeout.pm

2004-05-06 Thread Stas Bekman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: stas2004/05/06 20:46:27 Modified:t/filter/TestFilter both_str_con_add.pm t/protocol/TestProtocol echo_filter.pm echo_timeout.pm Log: workaround to a problem on some platforms (solaris, bsd, etc), where Apache 2.0.49+ forgets to set the bl

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/t/response/TestAPI module.pm

2004-05-06 Thread Stas Bekman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: stas2004/05/06 18:47:13 Modified:t/response/TestAPI module.pm Log: USE_(STATIC|DSO) can be both set at the same time, try MODPERL_LIB_SHARED Revision ChangesPath 1.11 +5 -4 modperl-2.0/t/response/TestAPI/module.pm Index: module.

Re: [Patch mp2] Fix api/module test to pass on static builds

2004-05-06 Thread Stas Bekman
That's correct, and really, it's a borked test then. It did pass for me once strangely, as I managed to have 2 mod_perls in my httpd, a static one and a dso loaded one ( can't reproduce that, lol) Index: t/response/TestAPI/module.pm =

Re: [Patch mp2] Statically compiling mod_perl without touching httpd

2004-05-06 Thread Philippe M. Chiasson
Stas Bekman wrote: >If I remember >correctly there were too many problems with that approach. And if that's the >case. We may need to first install httpd, then test modperl and then install >modperl. If there are no problems, then modperl's make install should install >htt

Re: [Patch mp2] Statically compiling mod_perl without touching httpd

2004-05-06 Thread Stas Bekman
If I remember correctly there were too many problems with that approach. And if that's the case. We may need to first install httpd, then test modperl and then install modperl. If there are no problems, then modperl's make install should install httpd as well, as it did in mp1 (plus note my que

Re: [Patch mp2] Statically compiling mod_perl without touching httpd

2004-05-06 Thread Philippe M. Chiasson
Stas Bekman wrote: >>>Should we think right away about how to do the flexible build, ala mp1? So one >>>can link httpd statically with mod_perl and other 3rd party modules which >>>require a separate build (php?). Or should we handle that one later? >> >> >>I'd put that one to a bit later, as t

Re: [Patch mp2] Statically compiling mod_perl without touching httpd

2004-05-06 Thread Stas Bekman
Should we think right away about how to do the flexible build, ala mp1? So one can link httpd statically with mod_perl and other 3rd party modules which require a separate build (php?). Or should we handle that one later? I'd put that one to a bit later, as things in httpd-2.0 land aren't as e

Re: [Patch mp2] Statically compiling mod_perl without touching httpd

2004-05-06 Thread Philippe M. Chiasson
Stas Bekman wrote: > Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: > >>After thinkering about all the problems with my initial solutions >>and looking a bit more closely at httpd's build system, I've come >>up with a solution that doesn't involve any patching. >> >>It would be used like this >> >>$> perl Makefile

Re: [Patch mp2] Statically compiling mod_perl without touching httpd

2004-05-06 Thread Stas Bekman
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: After thinkering about all the problems with my initial solutions and looking a bit more closely at httpd's build system, I've come up with a solution that doesn't involve any patching. It would be used like this $> perl Makefile.PL \ MP_USE_STATIC=1 \ MP_AP_CON

[Patch mp2] Statically compiling mod_perl without touching httpd

2004-05-06 Thread Philippe M. Chiasson
After thinkering about all the problems with my initial solutions and looking a bit more closely at httpd's build system, I've come up with a solution that doesn't involve any patching. It would be used like this $> perl Makefile.PL \ MP_USE_STATIC=1 \ MP_AP_CONFIGURE="--with-mpm=prefork