Re: Fw: Re: Unable to set sockets to non blocking on OpenBSD

2004-09-03 Thread Ken Simpson
The APR_0_9_4 branch contains the patch. Where do I get the 2.0.51 release candidate tar? TTUL Ken Stas Bekman [03/09/04 21:15 -0400]: > Ken Simpson wrote: > >>Is it in the upcoming 2.0.51? In which case we may need to subject tests > >>to skip on OpenBSD && apache_version < 2.0.51? > > > > > >T

Re: Fw: Re: Unable to set sockets to non blocking on OpenBSD

2004-09-03 Thread Stas Bekman
Ken Simpson wrote: Is it in the upcoming 2.0.51? In which case we may need to subject tests to skip on OpenBSD && apache_version < 2.0.51? The APR CVS tree has been updated. Since there hasn't yet been an Apache 2.0.51 tag applied, I can't say for sure that it's part of 2.0.51. If the standard is

Re: Patch to add APR::Socket->poll()

2004-09-03 Thread Stas Bekman
Ken Simpson wrote: Thanks Ken. I need to do some more work on the test before I commit the whole thing. I get: [Fri Sep 03 19:03:07 2004] [error] APR::Socket::recv: (104) Connection reset by peer at /home/stas/apache.org/mp2-poll/t/protocol/TestProtocol/echo_nonblock.pm line 41 when the serve

Re: Fw: Re: Unable to set sockets to non blocking on OpenBSD

2004-09-03 Thread Ken Simpson
> Is it in the upcoming 2.0.51? In which case we may need to subject tests > to skip on OpenBSD && apache_version < 2.0.51? The APR CVS tree has been updated. Since there hasn't yet been an Apache 2.0.51 tag applied, I can't say for sure that it's part of 2.0.51. If the standard is to use the HEA

Re: Patch to add APR::Socket->poll()

2004-09-03 Thread Ken Simpson
> Thanks Ken. I need to do some more work on the test before I commit the > whole thing. I get: > > [Fri Sep 03 19:03:07 2004] [error] APR::Socket::recv: (104) Connection > reset by peer at > /home/stas/apache.org/mp2-poll/t/protocol/TestProtocol/echo_nonblock.pm > line 41 > > when the server

Re: Fw: Re: Unable to set sockets to non blocking on OpenBSD

2004-09-03 Thread Stas Bekman
Ken Simpson wrote: Hi Stas, The APR patch to fix nonblocking sockets on OpenBSD has been applied: Thanks Ken. Is it in the upcoming 2.0.51? In which case we may need to subject tests to skip on OpenBSD && apache_version < 2.0.51? - Forwarded message from Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Fr

Re: Patch to add APR::Socket->poll()

2004-09-03 Thread Stas Bekman
Ken Simpson wrote: Hi Stas, Here's the patch for APR::Poll, complete with some documentation. I haven't included your non-blocking protocol handler tests -- could you paste them in when you make the commit to the tree? Thanks Ken. I need to do some more work on the test before I commit the whole

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/lib/Apache Build.pm

2004-09-03 Thread Stas Bekman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: geoff 2004/09/03 06:02:39 Modified:lib/Apache Build.pm Log: polish build in cases where apr, apr-util, and httpd all live in separate directories. Submitted by: Joe Orton +1 Revision ChangesPath 1.173 +2 -1 modperl-2.0/lib/Apache/Build.

Re: SEGV in $bb->cleanup

2004-09-03 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: I had to hack around that to get the test to run, but unfortunately I don't have a patch for Apache::Test that resolves the issue. That someone would be me of course. Is that the change I've applied yesterday? It's an endless loop of fixing something and breaking something el

Re: Patch to add APR::Socket->poll()

2004-09-03 Thread Ken Simpson
Hi Stas, Here's the patch for APR::Poll, complete with some documentation. I haven't included your non-blocking protocol handler tests -- could you paste them in when you make the commit to the tree? Index: docs/api/APR/Socket.pod ==

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0 Changes

2004-09-03 Thread Geoffrey Young
> Oh, no, it doesn't work :(. I swear I tested this, but I guess I forgot > to revert the other changes in the patch properly. > > It's not picking up apu-config properly because it looks in APR_BINDIR > rather than APU_BINDIR. This *really* fixes it: yup, that did the trick - committed. than