Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to propose the following change to make rolling release
candidates slightly easier.
Instead of removing the -dev in ./Changes, we could change it to rc1,
rc2, etc.
The version would then be 'mod_perl-2.0.x-rcn' and the tarball would be
mod_perl-2.
Your friendly neighborhood reminder:
10. Old Versions
Remind other Developers to delete versions older then the prior release
from CPAN. Old releases can always be found on BackPan.
--
END
What doesn't kill us can only ma
Hi,
I'd like to propose the following change to make rolling release candidates
slightly easier.
Instead of removing the -dev in ./Changes, we could change it to rc1, rc2,
etc.
The version would then be 'mod_perl-2.0.x-rcn' and the tarball would be
mod_perl-2.0.x-rcn.tar.gz which untars
Hi,
I'm using following patch with mod_perl2 in my developing environment.
This might be helpful for others, but I'm not sure this will break
something in the environment with another configuration.
(1) With prefork MPM, fixup %INC variable to be stored as absolute
path after eval(). This c
I suppose the only solution is to merge the modperl dev list and
mailchannels dev list into one. I keep on screwing up :(
--
_
Stas Bekman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://stason.org/
MailChannels: Assured Messaging(TM) http://mailchann
I'm trying to figure out what's the best way to handle multiple messages
over the same connection case, since it looks like we may have a problem with.
So first of all the access logging. Should we commit the log at the end of
EOM? (and also try in the handler in case EOM wasn't reached)
At t