Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
> and if you try my last patch suggestion?
Hi, yikes, I'm behind Anyway, I finally got around to trying this.
Same result as without. Hopefully, at some point during the week,
I'll be able to turn on tracing and the
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
> and if you try my last patch suggestion?
Hi, yikes, I'm behind Anyway, I finally got around to trying this.
Same result as without. Hopefully, at some point during the week, I'll
be able to turn on tracing and the like and see why nothing cha
Stas Bekman wrote:
> and if you try my last patch suggestion?
Hi, yikes, I'm behind Anyway, I finally got around to trying this.
Same result as without. Hopefully, at some point during the week, I'll be able
to turn on tracing and the like and see why nothing changed.
svn diff
Index: src/
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
I never use that approach. make test is a way too slow if you need to
do repetitive testing. I always do:
t/TEST t/apache/content_length_header.t
In which case it'll never descend into sub-dirs.
A
Stas Bekman wrote:
> Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
>
>> Stas Bekman wrote:
>>
>>> I never use that approach. make test is a way too slow if you need to
>>> do repetitive testing. I always do:
>>>
>>> t/TEST t/apache/content_length_header.t
>>>
>>> In which case it'll never descend into sub-dirs.
>
