Frank Wiles wrote:
> Attached is a patch that moves all have_min_apache_version('2.1')s to
> have_min_apache_version('2.2')s.
I thought about that, but I don't think we need to do it - the 2.1 assertion
is still valid, and it's somewhat nice to have knowledge of when things
changed for hist
Here is a short report on how tests went with r357411 and Apache
2.2.0 on Fedora Core 4:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
t/apr-ext/base64.t 255 65280?? ??
Attached is a patch that moves all have_min_apache_version('2.1')s to
have_min_apache_version('2.2')s.
-
Frank Wiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.wiles.org
-
apache2.2-test.patch
Description: Binary data
---
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Stas Bekman wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
I guess if there are no objections I'll commit it on Monday.
Sounds good to me - I tested the patch out on Win32 with the
Apache-Test tests and also the apreq tests (which involve
some cgi tests), and these worked fine.
--
best regar
