Issac Goldstand wrote:
Following up on the FAIL report for win32:
Can you post your "configuration" steps -- I'm the wrong person to ask,
but someone else might know. I see Steve H. got passing results.
Which CGI tests fail ?
The new Apache-Test-1.29-RC2 runs the test suite for 2.08 just fi
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Sorry, I missed Randy's comments.
Well, how about having this file auto-generated *and* commited, so only
before a new release someone, who does have an access to svn, will
re-auto-generate the file? And if Randy is RM, someone
perl Makefile.pl MP_MAINTAINER=1 *finally* works on BSD derivatives with
bleed perl again. (That was almost 1 year in the making)
In case anyone is trying this.
--
Philip M. Gollucci ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 323.219.4708
Consul
Stas Bekman wrote:
Sorry, I missed Randy's comments.
Well, how about having this file auto-generated *and* commited, so only
before a new release someone, who does have an access to svn, will
re-auto-generate the file? And if Randy is RM, someone else could run
that update for Randy.
I thin
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Like um, are you kidding me?
SVN switches the .svn dir's entries file to a binary format which
IMHO is a good thing(tm) its much faster.
Yay, that's fantastic!
Obviously, I swap some paths to get a 1.3.x and re-checkout
Stas Bekman wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Like um, are you kidding me?
SVN switches the .svn dir's entries file to a binary format which IMHO
is a good thing(tm) its much faster.
Yay, that's fantastic!
Obviously, I swap some paths to get a 1.3.x and re-checkout to roll
-rc2, but is ther
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Like um, are you kidding me?
SVN switches the .svn dir's entries file to a binary format which IMHO
is a good thing(tm) its much faster.
Yay, that's fantastic!
Obviously, I swap some paths to get a 1.3.x and re-checkout to roll
-rc2, but is there any reason a simpl
Nikolay Ananiev wrote:
===
--- t/response/TestApache/daemon.pm (revision 453124)
+++ t/response/TestApache/daemon.pm (working copy)
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
use Apache::TestUtil;
use Apache::Test;
-use constant WIN32 => Apache::TestConfig:
Nikolay Ananiev wrote:
"Steve Hay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
All OK on Win32 using apache-2.2.2 and perl-5.8.8
Philip, I checked this and it seems that only half of my patch (
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/dev/90865 )
made it into the svn rep. T
"Steve Hay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> All OK on Win32 using apache-2.2.2 and perl-5.8.8
CYGWIN_NT-5.1 1.5.21, perl 5.8.7, Apache/2.2.2
Failed TestStat Wstat Total Fail List of Failed
Apache/2.2.2 (prefork MPM), CYGWIN_NT-5.1 1.5.21(0.156/4/2), perl 5.8.7
All tests successful.
Files=6, Tests=22, 24 wallclock secs (12.04 cusr + 10.22 csys = 22.26 CPU)
"Steve Hay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> All OK on Win32 using apache-1.3.34, perl-5.8.8 and m
All OK on Win32 using apache-2.2.2 and perl-5.8.8
--
Radan Computational Ltd.
The information contained in this message and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this
messag
All OK on Win32 using apache-1.3.34, perl-5.8.8 and mod_perl-1.29
--
Radan Computational Ltd.
The information contained in this message and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have recei
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
If I could have some feed back I'll start thinking about getting
0.92-rc1 prepped.
*sigh* that should have been 0.91-rc1 [I'm not doing good with version
numbers today]
--
Philip M. Gollucci ([
Issac Goldstand wrote:
Win32 (VS2003) - httpd/2.2.3 - ActivePerl 5.8.8.819
PASS Apache-Test
PASS mod_perl
FAIL libapreq2
libapreq passed the 2 sets of C-based tests and failed the 3rd set
(quite miserably), so it may just be a bug in Apache-Test. I'll look
into it and send a proper bug report
Hi All,
do we need to have the standard ASF license header in the *.pm files in
Apache-SizeLimit. Currently none of them do, but we do have the LICENSE
file.
--
Philip M. Gollucci ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 323.219.4708
Consu
Hi,
Way back from "the plan" email .. I'm looking for some feedback on
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/perl/modperl/branches/apache_sizelimit_integration/
and
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/perl/modperl/branches/1.x/
Which should both integrate the current
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/perl/Apache-Si
17 matches
Mail list logo
