At 21:43 22.05.2002, Doug MacEachern wrote:
>On Thu, 23 May 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> > In any case if the wrapper is used, the scripts won't work under
> > mod_cgi. On the other hand if File::Basename::dirname() is used
> > explicitly the script will still work with mod_cgi.
>
>good point. we
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
> In any case if the wrapper is used, the scripts won't work under
> mod_cgi. On the other hand if File::Basename::dirname() is used
> explicitly the script will still work with mod_cgi.
good point. we should probably not bother providing something spe
i'm working on the issue with chdir, which we cannot use in 2.0, because
it's not thread-safe.
The issue of require() and friends when they use relative paths is
easily resolved by pushing the script's dir as the first element of @INC.
The big issue is the open() call when it tries to open a f
