Re: an order of execution for PerlModule and PerlRequire regardingApache2.pm

2002-06-03 Thread Stas Bekman
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > Ok, so the advisory should be: > > > > If you use a startup file, add at the top of it: > > > > use Apache2 (); > > > > Only if you don't use a startup file, use: > > > > PerlModule Apache2 > > >

Re: an order of execution for PerlModule and PerlRequire regardingApache2.pm

2002-06-03 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Stas Bekman wrote: > Ok, so the advisory should be: > > If you use a startup file, add at the top of it: > > use Apache2 (); > > Only if you don't use a startup file, use: > > PerlModule Apache2 > > or something like this. ok? sure, but keep in mind if we figure the

Re: an order of execution for PerlModule and PerlRequire regardingApache2.pm

2002-06-03 Thread Stas Bekman
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > Therefore the following fails: > > > >PerlModule Apache2 > >PerlRequire "/home/httpd/httpd-2.0/perl/startup.pl" > > > > if the startup file needs something from Apache2/ (which is in 99% the > >

Re: an order of execution for PerlModule and PerlRequire regardingApache2.pm

2002-06-03 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, Stas Bekman wrote: > Therefore the following fails: > >PerlModule Apache2 >PerlRequire "/home/httpd/httpd-2.0/perl/startup.pl" > > if the startup file needs something from Apache2/ (which is in 99% the > case). one can always 'use Apache2 ();' in startup.pl instea