On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > - do we need modperl_use_module() to implement CORE::use
>
> into what namespace would things be imported?
true, no import() is needed other than for modules that use import() to do
various initialization/
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> So is modperl_require_module() is used only for CORE::require()? If so
at the moment, yes.
> - do we need modperl_use_module() to implement CORE::use
into what namespace would things be imported?
> - should it be based on modperl_require_module() an
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> > - shouldn't PerlRequire be just an alias for PerlModule? since apparently
> > its implementation seem to be identical to PerlModule.
>
> PerlRequire puts quotes around the value, since PerlRequire is a file,
> whereas PerlModule is a bareword.
So i
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> OK I've finally wrapped my head around how things work at the server
> startup.
>
> This [the patch at the bottom] is a crude proof of concept code for
> PerlModule. Before I wrap it all nicely, please tell me if that's more or
> less how things should
