On Mon, 21 May 2001, Brian Aker wrote:
> Nope, the opposite. A year or two ago I was at the perl
> conference and noticed sun passing out a marketing flier
> as to why you should write web apps in Java. They
> specifically defined servlet as a persistent component
> that could have a persistent c
brian moseley wrote:
>
> On Sun, 20 May 2001, Brian Aker wrote:
>
> > FWIW I refer to any perl code that is persistent and is
> > making use of mod_perl as a servlet.
>
> "servlet" is a specific term coined by sun referring to a a
> specific component in the servlet api. you're just being
> unc
>
> the end goal of a application server is to simplify the
> entire process of developing and deploying a complete
> application, not just one part of it. we're really talking
> about a whole different order of magnitude.
>
I agree to you with this goal (and that&#x
On Sun, 20 May 2001, Brian Aker wrote:
> FWIW I refer to any perl code that is persistent and is
> making use of mod_perl as a servlet.
"servlet" is a specific term coined by sun referring to a a
specific component in the servlet api. you're just being
uncreative and confusing.
---
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Gerald Richter wrote:
> I agree to Matt, there is nothing missing for an
> application server, it's mainly a matter of installation
> and documentation, so for people not familar with CPAN
> it's maybe hard to find.
you're both missing my po
Gerald Richter wrote:
> I think "Application Server" is not a well defined term, so we may not get
> consensus here what it is. What's about calling the section "Application
> Servers/Toolkits running under mod_perl". Then it's up to the reader how
> he/s
> so I think we're fully justified in calling these things application
> servers.
>
I agree to Matt, there is nothing missing for an application server, it's
mainly a matter of installation and documentation, so for people not familar
with CPAN it's maybe hard to find.
On Thu, 17 May 2001, brian moseley wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2001, brian moseley wrote:
>
> > i think "application server" describes a system that
> > does more than implementing a templating language.
>
> er, that's not to diss anybody's software. ev
On Thu, 17 May 2001, brian moseley wrote:
> i think "application server" describes a system that
> does more than implementing a templating language.
er, that's not to diss anybody's software. everything on
that short list is great stuff. but i stand behind my
asse
