Joe Schaefer wrote:
Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
+=item * compress()
+
+ overlap($table, $flags);
+
+Compress the data in C<$table>.
better:
Converts multi-valued keys in C<$table> to single-valued keys.
ok
+
+param C<$table>: The table to add the data to.
+
^^^
Ah, of course, now I remember why I did that, thanks ;). Should we pass
two arguments? the perl function and the C function?
modperl_apr_func_not_implemented(timeout_get, apr_socket_timeout_get,
2.0.40, 0.9.0);
I'd probably stick with one or the other, but not both.
--Geoff
--
Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> +=item * compress()
> +
> + overlap($table, $flags);
> +
> +Compress the data in C<$table>.
better:
Converts multi-valued keys in C<$table> to single-valued keys.
> +
> +param C<$table>: The table to add the data to.
> +
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Ah, of course, now I remember why I did that, thanks ;). Should we
pass two arguments? the perl function and the C function?
modperl_apr_func_not_implemented(timeout_get, apr_socket_timeout_get,
2.0.40, 0.9.0);
I'd probably stick with one or the other, but not both.
repo
ocket_timeout_set(apr_socket_t *sock, apr_interval_time_t t)
{
-modperl_apr_func_not_implemented(timeout_set, 0.9.0);
+modperl_apr_func_not_implemented(timeout_set, 2.0.40, 0.9.0);
return APR_ENOTIMPL;
}
#endif /* pre-APR_0_9_0 (APACHE_2_0_40) */
+
+/* pre-APR_0_9_5 (APACHE_2_0_47)
+ *
-modperl_apr_func_not_implemented(timeout_get, 0.9.0); +
modperl_apr_func_not_implemented(timeout_get, 2.0.40, 0.9.0); return
APR_ENOTIMPL; }
+modperl_apr_func_not_implemented(apr_socket_timeout_get, 2.0.40,
0.9.0);
yeah, I thought about that. the reason I kept it the way it was is bec
Geoffrey Young wrote:
-modperl_apr_func_not_implemented(timeout_get, 0.9.0); +
modperl_apr_func_not_implemented(timeout_get, 2.0.40, 0.9.0); return
APR_ENOTIMPL; }
+modperl_apr_func_not_implemented(apr_socket_timeout_get, 2.0.40,
0.9.0);
yeah, I thought about that. the reason I kept
modperl_apr_func_not_implemented(timeout_set, 2.0.40, 0.9.0);
return APR_ENOTIMPL;
}
+modperl_apr_func_not_implemented(apr_socket_timeout_set, 2.0.40, 0.9.0);
+/* added in APACHE_2_0_47/APR_0_9_4 */
+void apr_table_compress(apr_table_t *t, unsigned flags)
+{
+modperl_apr_func_not_
Geoffrey Young wrote:
[...]
modperl_apache_compat.c does exactly that. make sure to mark when it
was added so when we bump up the minimal required version we can
remove the old workarounds.
ap_table_compress first appears in 2.0.47. both 2.0.46 and 2.0.47 claim
to have APR 0.9.4, so I guess w
ignored how? 2.0.38 compiles cleanly but then throws a runtime error
when I try and use the function (which I guess that is how it always
works when you call an undefined C function)
Hmm, right, I think WrapXS picks things from the Function.pm and not
actually checking the C-source.
In that
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
hi
I've implemented apr_table_compress, which was recently added to
the APR table API.
the only thing I'm unsure about is what our position is on APR
changes - can we rely on the autogeneration code for this (an
Stas Bekman wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
hi
I've implemented apr_table_compress, which was recently added to the
APR table API.
the only thing I'm unsure about is what our position is on APR
changes - can we rely on the autogeneration code for this (and perhaps
other recent
Geoffrey Young wrote:
hi
I've implemented apr_table_compress, which was recently added to the
APR table API.
the only thing I'm unsure about is what our position is on APR changes
- can we rely on the autogeneration code for this (and perhaps other
recent additions), breaking b
hi
I've implemented apr_table_compress, which was recently added to the APR
table API.
the only thing I'm unsure about is what our position is on APR changes -
can we rely on the autogeneration code for this (and perhaps other recent
additions), breaking back compat, or do we
14 matches
Mail list logo
