On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
> We should get the cvs version ready for a release, since
> once perl-5.8.1 is released we must release mp 1.99_10,
> 1.99_09 won't work with 5.8.1. Hopefully this won't happen
> this week. But it seems like Jarkko wants to release it
> any moment now.
>
> >
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
We should get the cvs version ready for a release, since
once perl-5.8.1 is released we must release mp 1.99_10,
1.99_09 won't work with 5.8.1. Hopefully this won't happen
this week. But it seems like Jarkko wants to release it
any moment
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > stas2003/08/06 14:59:04
> >
> > Modified:.Makefile.PL Changes
> > Log:
> > - now requiring 5.8.x/ithreads for threaded mpms (now doing the check
> > against the mpm, rather than OS name)
>
> can someo
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stas2003/08/06 14:59:04
Modified:.Makefile.PL Changes
Log:
- now requiring 5.8.x/ithreads for threaded mpms (now doing the check
against the mpm, rather than OS name)
can someone on win32
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stas2003/08/06 14:59:04
Modified:.Makefile.PL Changes
Log:
- now requiring 5.8.x/ithreads for threaded mpms (now doing the check
against the mpm, rather than OS name)
can someone on win32 check that I didn't break anything? I've replaced the
ch
On Sat, 3 Nov 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > dougm 01/11/02 09:33:46
> >
> > Modified:.Makefile.PL
> > Log:
> > XXX: MakeMaker will try to unlink $(APACHE_LIBDIR)/$MODPERL_LIB
> > during 'make' and probably 'make clean' as well
> > need to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> dougm 01/11/02 09:33:46
>
> Modified:.Makefile.PL
> Log:
> XXX: MakeMaker will try to unlink $(APACHE_LIBDIR)/$MODPERL_LIB
> during 'make' and probably 'make clean' as well
> need to find another way to install libmodperl.so
may I ask, wha
Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>
>>I don't have any installed, but I don't understand what's the problem?
>>what is the problem with 'make clean'? How can I reproduce the problem?
>>
>
> when i had done 'make clean', and 'perl Makefile.PL && make' not all
On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> I don't have any installed, but I don't understand what's the problem?
> what is the problem with 'make clean'? How can I reproduce the problem?
when i had done 'make clean', and 'perl Makefile.PL && make' not all of
the .pm's and .so's were ending up
Doug MacEachern wrote:
> stas, as i suspected, this patch does not work. please try with 'make
> clean' and without any modperl-2.0 modules installed into the default
> @INC.
I don't have any installed, but I don't understand what's the problem?
what is the problem with 'make clean'? How can
stas, as i suspected, this patch does not work. please try with 'make
clean' and without any modperl-2.0 modules installed into the default
@INC.
On 11 Oct 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> dougm 01/10/10 20:29:32
>
> Modified:.Makefile.PL
> Log:
> the DIR => [] patch doe
11 matches
Mail list logo
