Geoffrey Young wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Here is the problem. If a module fails to load once it must not be
blacklisted. The test demonstrates how a module may fail if loaded
from the wrong directory, but then is supposed to succeed if moved to
a different directory.
this is somewhat addres
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 10:30:19AM -0500, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> "The following patch arranges for failures to be cached in %INC as undef
> values (success is still cached as filename). I think this should be OK;
> I'm not aware of any other meaning for undef values in %INC (and neither is
> the
I made some progress on making sure that the problem is reproducable. Rasing
#define HV_MAX_LENGTH_BEFORE_SPLIT 14
makes it a much higher trashold for most normal keys to trigger rehashing, but
I'm happy that the new test is happily failing to find a previously cached
stash, despite the high
Stas Bekman wrote:
Here is the problem. If a module fails to load once it must not be
blacklisted. The test demonstrates how a module may fail if loaded from
the wrong directory, but then is supposed to succeed if moved to a
different directory.
this is somewhat addressed in the original threa
