I just treat the partitioned topic as a set of named non-partitioned
topics. Pulsar doesn't really have any partitioned definition. So the
non-partitioned topics would be the partition of the partitioned
topic.
I think the real confusion is that we can create the non-partitioned
topic independentl
I agree that the terminology is confusing. On a practical note, that
confusion likely caused this bug [0].
> I'd like to say "a partitioned topic is a topic that consists of
> multiple non-partitioned topics". It's better not to use the "internal
> topic" concept.
+1
In general, I think the equi
I'd like to say "a partitioned topic is a topic that consists of
multiple non-partitioned topics". It's better not to use the "internal
topic" concept.
Thanks,
Yunze
On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 4:31 PM Joo Hyuk Kim wrote:
>
> Hi community:
>
> Currently, it seems like there is no good definition of
Hi community:
Currently, it seems like there is no good definition of what "partitioned
topic" and "non-partitioned topic" mean and some places topic
partition and internal
topic interchangeably.
I would like to propose to vote (or discuss) to come up with solid
definition of what composes "parti
