Hi All,
Suriya successfully demoed the GCE integration to Stratos and you can find
the session at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7GMH3UFDvg
Please join me on Congratulating Suriya for all the hard work put on to
this project and for the job very well done!
We will create Jiras to track follow-
Nice work! It was nice to see Stratos running on GCE. What are the follow
up items?
Azeez
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Sathyasuriya Priya wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> We will have a short demo of GCE support, discussion of remaining tasks.
>
> Time: Wednesday 10:30 AM - 11:00 AM IST
>
> Followin
Hi All,
Sorry for being late on this thread. A similar issue has been reported in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-675. Faced this issue when
having multiple clusters. In that case, CEP always sends the stats to a
particular cluster rather than sending stats per cluster. So, one clust
Please join
https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/hoaevent/AP36tYf18pDJN18R6T0vIeK_l4K5FIsU4I8FJqm84ifehja7j2xV-w?authuser=0&hl=en
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Sathyasuriya Priya wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> We will have a short demo of GCE support, discussion of remaining tasks.
>
> Time: Wednesday
Hi Mari,
Yes we can list customization parameters - description and default values-
best practices etch
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Mariangela Hills
wrote:
> Hi Udara,
>
> This is a good idea. What about having a configuration guide for Apache
> Stratos, which includes configurations for
Hi Udara,
This is a good idea. What about having a configuration guide for Apache
Stratos, which includes configurations for customization plus default
configurations. I think it will be a huge effort to gather all the
descriptions, but if we all can get together and create a configuration
guide,
Re-igniting this discussion, I think registry based approach is not a
viable solution, as what we store here is pretty complex set of
relationships.
IMO we should come up with a DB design and uses a DB, to store these
information.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Isuru Haththotuwa
wrote:
> AF
+1. I can work with you and the team on creating this Mari.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Manula Chathurika Thantriwatte <
manu...@wso2.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1. We can have them like section called configurations.
>
> Thanks !
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Udara Liyanage wrote:
>
If we are doing New UI + Role based access, IMO we should go with a 4.1.0
release, not 4.0.1 release. Because it has some new features as well.
Considering these IMHO we should do a 4.1.0 against master brach ASAP. All
docker, grouping stuff will going to release against master. May be we can
plan
Hi Sajith,
Please find the inline comments.
Thanks,
Gayan
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Sajith Kariyawasam wrote:
> Hi Gayan,
>
> I have few things to get clarified in the initial design.
>
> Are you maintaining the data structure template per tenant? How do you
> maintain the password in
Hi Gayan,
I have few things to get clarified in the initial design.
Are you maintaining the data structure template per tenant? How do you
maintain the password in the cartridge instance?
Does the communication between metadata-service and Greg happen in tenant
mode or super-tenant mode?
Thank
Good read: CoreOS explained by Alex Polvi, CEO of CoreOS
http://www.activestate.com/blog/2013/08/alex-polvi-explains-coreos
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Lakmal Warusawithana
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:52 PM, chris snow wrote:
>
>> Shall I reach out asking if they are interes
Further clarification of point 1 ,
In current meta data service once you call the retrieve meta data service
with cartridge specified, it will return whole set of meta data related to
that cartridge. So in the client side you need to filter the information
you needed from that response JSON object.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:52 PM, chris snow wrote:
> Shall I reach out asking if they are interested in collaborating and what
> channel is best for this?
>
+1 Chris.
> On 12 Aug 2014 10:07, "Nirmal Fernando" wrote:
>
>> Further, I feel even Fleet and Stratos has some common interests such as
Hi Isuru,
Please find my inline comments in blue.
1. In addition to getting all the meta data at one time, is it possible to
specifically get the value for one meta data property?
Currently it is not support for get a value of one meta data. Currently it
will return all the meta data related to
Mariangela Hills created STRATOS-740:
Summary: [Wiki] Add an Admin Guide
Key: STRATOS-740
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-740
Project: Stratos
Issue Type: Improvement
Shall I reach out asking if they are interested in collaborating and what
channel is best for this?
On 12 Aug 2014 10:07, "Nirmal Fernando" wrote:
> Further, I feel even Fleet and Stratos has some common interests such as ;
>
> * starting docker containers
> * service grouping.
> * providing HA e
Further, I feel even Fleet and Stratos has some common interests such as ;
* starting docker containers
* service grouping.
* providing HA etc.
https://coreos.com/docs/launching-containers/launching/launching-containers-fleet/
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Nirmal Fernando
wrote:
> I agree
I think we can collaborate through their forums
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/coreos-dev
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/coreos-user
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Nirmal Fernando
wrote:
> I agree Chris. What's the method you propose? mailing-list? I already
> raised few is
Hi Gayan,
Great work with the initial version of the meta data service!
I have a couple of questions regarding the current implementation.
1. In addition to getting all the meta data at one time, is it possible to
specifically get the value for one meta data property?
2. Are the current rest ope
I agree Chris. What's the method you propose? mailing-list? I already
raised few issues on their GitHub repos :-)
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:24 PM, chris snow wrote:
> Hi Nirmal, it sounds like we should be collaborating with the coreos team?
> I expect they will have strong views on the directi
Hi Nirmal, it sounds like we should be collaborating with the coreos team?
I expect they will have strong views on the direction we go?
On 12 Aug 2014 09:46, "Nirmal Fernando" wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> I think that'll be the case. But need to experiment and see.
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:37 PM
Hi Lakmal, response inline...
On 12 Aug 2014 05:31, "Lakmal Warusawithana" wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> Did you guys had a hangout meeting. Sorry I could not follow up. Here is
my thought of implementing/design/architecture.
We haven't had a meeting yet.
>
> We should have two mode of docker suppor
Hi Chris,
I think that'll be the case. But need to experiment and see.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:37 PM, chris snow wrote:
> Will stratos just manage coreos and not have to care which container
> manager, fleet or kubernetes is used by coreos?
> On 12 Aug 2014 08:38, "Nguyen Anh Tu" wrote:
>
Will stratos just manage coreos and not have to care which container
manager, fleet or kubernetes is used by coreos?
On 12 Aug 2014 08:38, "Nguyen Anh Tu" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:35 PM, chris snow wrote:
>
>> Are we thinking of kubernetes on coreos [1]?
>>
>> [1] https://coreos.com
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:35 PM, chris snow wrote:
> Are we thinking of kubernetes on coreos [1]?
>
> [1] https://coreos.com/blog/running-kubernetes-example-on-CoreOS-part-1/
>
Hi Chris,
We can use Fleet with CoreOS, same same with Kubernetes.
--Tuna
Are we thinking of kubernetes on coreos [1]?
[1] https://coreos.com/blog/running-kubernetes-example-on-CoreOS-part-1/
On 12 Aug 2014 07:50, "Nguyen Anh Tu" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Nirmal Fernando
> wrote:
>
>> Also, I was successfully able to spin up a CoreOS cluster in EC2
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Nirmal Fernando
> wrote:
>
>> Also, I was successfully able to spin up a CoreOS cluster in EC2.
>> Further, I will work on CoreOS-Stratos integration.
>>
>
> +1. Great, Nirmal!
>
> As my understanding, F
Hi,
+1. We can have them like section called configurations.
Thanks !
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Udara Liyanage wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are many configurations properties/parameters used in Stratos such
> as defaultFloatingIpPool etc which can be customized according to the
> deployment
29 matches
Mail list logo
