Hi Raj,
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
wrote:
> Please double check the java agent code too. It works somehow. Don't know
> the reason :)
The Java agent makes use of the org.apache.stratos.messaging component, so
any changes done from a publisher's point of view is reflect
Hi Udara,
It works. I have added the relevant changes in CLI.
Thanks !
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Manula Chathurika Thantriwatte <
manu...@wso2.com> wrote:
> Hi Udara,
>
> Thanks for the information. I'll try with this and update.
>
> Thanks !
>
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Udara Li
Hi All,
I have added new grouping commands in CLI. Those commands are,
deploy-service-group Deploy service group
deploy-application Deploy application
undeploy-service-group Undeploy service group
undeploy-application Undeploy application
describ
Fixed and pushed to fork. This commit is listed in the already existing PR.
https://github.com/apache/stratos/pull/106
Regards,
Chamila de Alwis
Software Engineer | WSO2 | +94772207163
Blog: code.chamiladealwis.com
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Chamila De Alwis wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Chamila De Alwis wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
> wrote:
>
>> When I use m2 java agent docker image, I am getting member activated
>> events. So status is not a compulsory field chamila.
>
>
> I will fix this then. From the existin
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
wrote:
> When I use m2 java agent docker image, I am getting member activated
> events. So status is not a compulsory field chamila.
I will fix this then. From the existing code at the time of writing the
Python agent, I assumed it was mandat
When I use m2 java agent docker image, I am getting member activated
events. So status is not a compulsory field chamila.
I am going to continue with m2 image for now.
Thanks.
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
wrote:
> Does anyone know why cluster status filed is commented out on
> Cluster.java?
>
> //private ClusterStatus status;
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Chamila De Alwis
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Raj,
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at
Does anyone know why cluster status filed is commented out on Cluster.java?
//private ClusterStatus status;
Thanks.
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Chamila De Alwis wrote:
>
> Hi Raj,
>
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
> wrote:
>
>> File "/mnt/cartridgeagent/modules/eve
Hi Udara,
Thanks for the information. I'll try with this and update.
Thanks !
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Udara Liyanage wrote:
> Hi Manula,
>
> I was able to fix this without [] branckets. I added a wrapper class
> ServiceGroupPOJO as below
>
>
>1. public class ServiceGroupPOJO
>
Hi Manula,
I was able to fix this without [] branckets. I added a wrapper class
ServiceGroupPOJO as below
1. public class ServiceGroupPOJO
2. {
3. private ServiceGroupDefinition serviceGroupDefinition;
4.
5. public ServiceGroupDefinition getServiceGroupDefinition ()
6.
Hi Raj,
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
wrote:
> File "/mnt/cartridgeagent/modules/event/topology/events.py", line 173, in
> create_from_json
> cluster_obj.status = cluster_str["status"]
> KeyError: 'status'
>
The "status" field is missing from the cluster object. From w
Chamila,
Here is a container agent log. Any idea what event processing fails?
[2014-11-08 04:20:46,152] DEBUG {eventsubscriber.py:on_message} - Message
received: 'topology/CompleteTopologyEvent':
'{"topology":{"serviceMap":{"php":{"serviceName":"php","serviceType":"SingleTenant","clusterIdCluster
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Nirmal Fernando
wrote:
> Hi Lahiru,
>
> All these are improvements and should have discussed in a new thread IMO.
> (these are buried now)
>
+1. I will send a complete proposal to a new thread.
Thanks.
>
> What we currently have is linear gradient, which is the
Hi Nirmal,
I have tried with the existing JSON format, but I'm unable to deserialized
it. Existing JSON format is follows. But in Partitions, autoscaling
policies, deployment policies we have JSON array format.
{
"serviceGroup":{
"cartridges":[
"tomcat"
],
"dependenc
Sorry for the delayed response Imesh.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote:
> Thanks for your response Nirmal, please see my thoughts below:
>
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Nirmal Fernando
> wrote:
>
>> AFAIU if it is statistics, it's all about random data, samples and
>>
Hi Lahiru,
All these are improvements and should have discussed in a new thread IMO.
(these are buried now)
What we currently have is linear gradient, which is the simplest form
(first step!)
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Lahiru Sandaruwan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Very interesting discussion and
GitHub user chamilad opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/stratos/pull/106
Python cartridge agent component
Wrote the maven-antrun-plugin execution to zip the
cartridgeagent/cartridgeagent/* contents
Renamed python_cartridgeagent to cartridgeagent
You can m
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote:
> AFAIK it would not be a problem if we do not package the dependent library
> with our source or binary distribution.
>
Then we'll use Dulwich. It is said to be a primitive interface, but I think
it can be built upon.
Regards,
Chamila d
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Chamila De Alwis wrote:
> Wouldn't the license involve usage even if we are not packing it along
> with the source?
>
> AFAIK it would not be a problem if we do not package the dependent library
with our source or binary distribution.
--
Imesh Gunaratne
Techni
As I found this problem this has been caused by the duplicated client id
values which we have set before. Now I have done a fix to set unique client
id values for each topic subscriber and publisher.
I did several verification tests on this fix using a sample event publisher
(sending 1000 events c
Hi Isuru,
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
> wrote:
>
>> I got containers to be created.
>> But didn't get the member started event. Either agent is not sending or
>> CC is not receiving. Looking into it currently
Hi Manula,
I am -0 to this change, since, having arrays make it difficult to process !
Can't we get it to work without arrays?
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Manula Chathurika Thantriwatte <
manu...@wso2.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have done the sample test with the following code segment [1].
Hi All,
I have done the sample test with the following code segment [1]. This works
successfully. I think we need to change the Service Definition bean class
and also we need to send service definition as JSON array.
[1]
https://github.com/manulachathurika/TestRestEndpoint/blob/master/TestEndpoin
Hi Isuru,
No, Still it didn't solve the issue.
@Udara, Currently we get Partitions, Deployment Polices etc... as JSON
array. I have done the test with Service Definition Group as JSON array and
it works successful with the deserialization. IMHO is having JSON array for
the Service Group Definitio
Hi Manula,
Why should we add [] brackets if there is only one ServiceGroup?
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa wrote:
> Hi Manula,
>
> Sorry if I'm missing something, but isn't this solved by the workaround
> Udara has mentioned in the mail thread [1] ?
>
> [1]. Json response sho
Hi Manula,
Sorry if I'm missing something, but isn't this solved by the workaround
Udara has mentioned in the mail thread [1] ?
[1]. Json response shows arrays as string when there are single value
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Manula Chathurika Thantriwatte <
manu...@wso2.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
Currently we get the service group definition using the GET curl command as
follows.
{
"serviceGroup":{
"cartridges":[
"tomcat"
],
"dependencies":{
"startupOrders":[
"group.group1,cartridge.tomcat"
],
"terminationBehaviour":
Hi Reka, Isuru,
I got the following NPE when I undeployed an app. While debuging I noticed
that the appId of the moniter is not set, thus application become null.
1. String appId = monitor.getAppId();
2.Application application = ApplicationHolder.
getApplicat
Udara Liyanage created STRATOS-943:
--
Summary: Publishing Application terminated event is published even
when there is no application
Key: STRATOS-943
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-943
Udara Liyanage created STRATOS-942:
--
Summary: Spinup instances even when application in undeployed
Key: STRATOS-942
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-942
Project: Stratos
Is
-
Scenario 4
We can have independent ratios between siblings.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Lahiru Sandaruwan wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Lahiru Sandaruwan
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We have done a design for application scaling.
>>
>> We can define scaling ratio
Hi Mariangela,
This is to request for *edit permission* for apache stratos wiki. Details
are as follows.
Name: Vishanth Balasubramaniam
Email: vishanth...@gmail.com
Thanks,
--
*Vishanth Balasubramaniam*
Software Engineer
WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
lean.enterprise.middleware
mobile: *+94771737
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Lahiru Sandaruwan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We have done a design for application scaling.
>
> We can define scaling ratio in the parents. Ratio only applies to the
> immediate children of the group and not further. Cartridge to cartridge
> ratio can be anything where G
Hi all,
We have done a design for application scaling.
We can define scaling ratio in the parents. Ratio only applies to the
immediate children of the group and not further. Cartridge to cartridge
ratio can be anything where Group to cartridge ratio should be 1:* always.
Because when we have cart
I guess we need to set clean session to false and use reliable delivery.
WDYT?
MqttConnectOptions connOpts = new MqttConnectOptions();
connOpts.setCleanSession(false);
*
* If set to false both the client and server will maintain state across
* restarts of the client, the server and the connectio
Gayan: I see another issue here:
We have set QOS to 2 in publisher:
MqttMessage mqttMSG = new MqttMessage(message.getBytes());
mqttMSG.setQos(QOS); // QOS => 2
** Quality of Service 2 - indicates that a message should*
** be delivered once. The message will be persisted to disk, and will*
** be
At a particular time we do have multiple listeners and only one topic
publisher for a component. Because of that generating a client id for
subscribers.
+1 for have client id unique according to this
[1].
http://www.eclipse.org/paho/files/javadoc/org/eclipse/paho/client/mqttv3/MqttClient.html#Mqt
We need to please. There're lot of emails generated due to these failures
last night.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Lasindu Charith wrote:
> Seems like the build failure is still there. But the master builds fine
> locally without an issue.
>
> The root cause seems to be
>
> ==
I'll do a quick fix to make the client id unique and run a test.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote:
> Gayan: Was there any reason for generating a client id for subscribers and
> setting a fixed value for publishers?
>
> TopicSubscriber.doSubscribe():
> MqttClient mqttClient
AFAIU the client id is used by the message broker for maintaining the
sessions among connection drops and restarts (for reliable message
delivery). Therefore each subscriber and publisher might need to have its
own client with a uniqe identifier.
I will fix this in messaging component.
On Fri, No
Hi Manula,
You have refered group1 in the group2, have you deployed group1?
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Udara Liyanage wrote:
> Hi Isuru,
>
> I will have a look
>
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Manula Chathurika Thantriwatte <
> manu...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Isuru,
>>
>> Below is the
Hi Manula,
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Manula Chathurika Thantriwatte <
manu...@wso2.com> wrote:
> Hi Udara / Isuru,
>
> Find the issue. I have missed to deploy group1. Once I deployed group1 the
> issue get fixed. Sorry for the inconvenience.
>
IMHO, the sub group being missing should not ca
Hi Udara / Isuru,
Find the issue. I have missed to deploy group1. Once I deployed group1 the
issue get fixed. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Thanks !
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Udara Liyanage wrote:
> Hi Manula,
>
> You have refered group1 in the group2, have you deployed group1?
>
> On Fri
Seems like the build failure is still there. But the master builds fine
locally without an issue.
The root cause seems to be
==
ERROR: test_interactive_mode_list_tenants (__main__.TestInteractive)
Hi Isuru,
Below is the service group definition which I have used to deploy.
{
"name": "group3",
"subGroups": [
"group1"
],
"cartridges": [
"tomcat"
],
"dependencies": {
"startupOrders": [
"group.group1,cartridge.tomcat"
],
"termin
Hi Isuru,
I will have a look
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Manula Chathurika Thantriwatte <
manu...@wso2.com> wrote:
> Hi Isuru,
>
> Below is the service group definition which I have used to deploy.
>
> {
>"name": "group3",
>"subGroups": [
>"group1"
>],
>"cartridges":
Gayan: Was there any reason for generating a client id for subscribers and
setting a fixed value for publishers?
TopicSubscriber.doSubscribe():
MqttClient mqttClient = MQTTConnector.getMQTTSubClient(Util.getRandomString(
5));
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa wrote:
>
>
> On
48 matches
Mail list logo
