[jira] [Updated] (STRATOS-1059) Extra space before "Back" button

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mariangela Hills updated STRATOS-1059: -- Attachment: Screen Shot 2015-01-09 at 12.15.11 PM.png > Extra space before "Back" butt

[jira] [Created] (STRATOS-1059) Extra space before "Back" button

Mariangela Hills created STRATOS-1059: - Summary: Extra space before "Back" button Key: STRATOS-1059 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1059 Project: Stratos Issue Type: Bu

[jira] [Updated] (STRATOS-1058) Wiki - Document the Improved Stratos UI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mariangela Hills updated STRATOS-1058: -- Summary: Wiki - Document the Improved Stratos UI (was: Wiki- Document Improved Strato

[jira] [Created] (STRATOS-1058) Wiki- Document Improved Stratos UI

Mariangela Hills created STRATOS-1058: - Summary: Wiki- Document Improved Stratos UI Key: STRATOS-1058 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1058 Project: Stratos Issue Type:

Re: [Discuss] Finalizing 4.1.0-Alpha Release

Thanks Lakmal, yes we could remove docker image resizing effort from alpha release since we have completed Kubernetes workflow. We have also completed the load balancer configuration task, now the latest task list status would be as follows: 1. Finalize Kubernetes Workflow (DONE) 2. Verify Service

[jira] [Updated] (STRATOS-1057) Button caption incorrect - Deploy Auto Scaling Policy Definition

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mariangela Hills updated STRATOS-1057: -- Attachment: Add_Autoscaling-policy.png Screenshot > Button caption incorrect - Deploy

Re: [Discuss] Finalizing 4.1.0-Alpha Release

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote: > Hi Devs, > > I'm now working on fixing Domain Mapping functionality. While doing this I > found another functionality which we need to fix (Task-9): > > 1. Finalize Kubernetes Workflow (DONE) > 2. Verify Service Grouping on OpenStack and E

[jira] [Created] (STRATOS-1057) Button caption incorrect - Deploy Auto Scaling Policy Definition

Mariangela Hills created STRATOS-1057: - Summary: Button caption incorrect - Deploy Auto Scaling Policy Definition Key: STRATOS-1057 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1057 Project:

Re: [Discuss] Finalizing 4.1.0-Alpha Release

Hi Devs, I'm now working on fixing Domain Mapping functionality. While doing this I found another functionality which we need to fix (Task-9): 1. Finalize Kubernetes Workflow (DONE) 2. Verify Service Grouping on OpenStack and EC2 (DONE) *3. Verify Clustering Support for Stratos Components (IN-PRO

Re: [Discuss] Kubernetes workflow is now working!

Thanks for you guys. Further issue showing up: ( the instance ubuntu 12.04 is from my private openstack ) vagrant-kubernetes-setup# ./up.sh ---> Step 0: Flush everything ==> minion-2: VM not created. Moving on... ==> minion-1: VM not created. Moving on... ==> master: VM not created. Moving on...

[jira] [Commented] (STRATOS-776) Stratos in docker image not starting

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14270172#comment-14270172 ] Iyad Elian commented on STRATOS-776: any progress on this? > Stratos in docker image

Re: Configuration of Load Balancer related to the service grouping

Great work Gayan! Thanks for the update! On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Gayan Gunarathne wrote: > Verified the changes with the single LB and tomcat group in EC2.I will > continue test with more complex group scenario with several cartridges. > > Found a error that own cluster id append to the

Re: Configuration of Load Balancer related to the service grouping

Verified the changes with the single LB and tomcat group in EC2.I will continue test with more complex group scenario with several cartridges. Found a error that own cluster id append to the dependency cluster id. Fixed that error with 22127619b5d727cfaef5152dcd92eb980d5a3058. Thanks, Gayan On T

Re: [Discuss] Domain Mappings Functionality in 4.1.0 Release

Thanks for the quick feedback Lakmal! +1 for the suggestions on core domain mapping functionality. I will incorporate those with this fix. We already have REST API methods for managing domain mappings, I will update those accordingly with this modification. Thanks On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 3:18 PM,

Re: [Discuss] Domain Mappings Functionality in 4.1.0 Release

Hi Imesh, Here is few steps in my mind. - Need to expose REST API for domain mapping. It should generic to single and MT applications - Need to have some REST API for getting application structure with relevant aliases for create json payload for both signup and domain mapping. - T

Re: [Discuss] Kubernetes workflow is now working!

Error says "group id cannot be empty". But we do not have grouping in 4.1.0-m3 developer preview. It seems David is trying master branch with M3 guide. Please follow the document Imesh shared if you trying out master branch. Thanks. On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote: > Hi Da

Re: Configuration of Load Balancer related to the service grouping

Great! Thanks for the update Gayan! On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Gayan Gunarathne wrote: > Hi Imesh, > > Yes. I have pushed all the changes related to the load balances > configuration to the master branch. Currently I am testing those with the > ec2.Will update the thread with testing outcom

Re: [Discuss] Kubernetes workflow is now working!

Hi David, If you prefer you could tryout the latest Kubernetes implementation in the master branch by refering the following document: https://gist.github.com/imesh/b8f81fac8de39183a504 If you need to get 4.1.0-M3 working, please send us the artifacts (json files) that you are using and the carbo

Re: Configuration of Load Balancer related to the service grouping

Hi Imesh, Yes. I have pushed all the changes related to the load balances configuration to the master branch. Currently I am testing those with the ec2.Will update the thread with testing outcome. Thanks. Gayan On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote: > Hi Gayan, > > I know that

Re: [Discuss] Kubernetes workflow is now working!

Hi David, Are you using the code base with 4.1.0-m3 tag or master branch? Thanks. On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 2:23 PM, david hbase wrote: > Kubernetes workflow is not working! >

Re: Configuration of Load Balancer related to the service grouping

Hi Gayan, I know that you have done the changes needed for sending dependency cluster id list to load balancer. IMO we do not need any changes in load balancer since it already has a cluster id filter which we could make use of for this functionality. Were you able to test the changes you have do

Re: [Discuss] Kubernetes workflow is now working!

Kubernetes workflow is not working! I have following all the steps in the M3, but can not "Registering Kubernetes-CoreOS Host Cluster in Stratos" Er

[GitHub] stratos pull request: Added basic changes needed for clustering of...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/stratos/pull/165 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena

[GitHub] stratos pull request: Added basic changes needed for clustering of...

Github user imesh commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/stratos/pull/165#issuecomment-69149550 I have now merged this pull request to master branch. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If yo

[GitHub] stratos pull request: Added basic changes needed for clustering of...

Github user imesh commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/stratos/pull/165#issuecomment-69149403 This pull request looks good. Thanks Shiro for taking the initial steps of introducing distributed maps in Autoscaler. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply

[Discuss] Domain Mappings Functionality in 4.1.0 Release

Hi Devs, Domain mappings functionality was introduced in 4.0.0 release to allow users to map domain names for their service subscriptions. The result was that users were able to use domain names for accessing service clusters without having to use the generated cluster host names. In 4.0.0 releas

[GitHub] stratos pull request: Added basic changes needed for clustering of...

GitHub user shirolk opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/stratos/pull/165 Added basic changes needed for clustering of Autoscaler component You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/shirolk/stratos master-cluste