Re: Cleaning up User Artifacts at Signup Removal

2015-12-09 Thread Isuru Haththotuwa
Hi, On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Akila Ravihansa Perera wrote: > Hi Isuru, > > The problem is master branch will have not only bug fixes but also new > features and backward incompatible API changes which should not go to a > patch release. > If there are new features with API changes, IMO

Re: Cleaning up User Artifacts at Signup Removal

2015-12-09 Thread Gayan Gunarathne
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Akila Ravihansa Perera wrote: > Hi Isuru, > > The problem is master branch will have not only bug fixes but also new > features and backward incompatible API changes which should not go to a > patch release. > When we develop new feature and fix the bug, we can

Re: Cleaning up User Artifacts at Signup Removal

2015-12-09 Thread Akila Ravihansa Perera
Hi Isuru, The problem is master branch will have not only bug fixes but also new features and backward incompatible API changes which should not go to a patch release. Thanks. On Thursday, 10 December 2015, Isuru Haththotuwa wrote: > +1, will cherry pick the commits to master. > > On Thu, Dec

Re: Cleaning up User Artifacts at Signup Removal

2015-12-09 Thread Isuru Haththotuwa
+1, will cherry pick the commits to master. On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Akila Ravihansa Perera wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam > wrote: > >> Hi Isuru, >> >> We have rebased stratos-4.1.x branch into master branch. We should >> continue the development in m

Re: [Vote] Release Apache Stratos 4.1.5-RC3.

2015-12-09 Thread Thanuja Uruththirakodeeswaran
+1 for the release. verified following: 1. Build source with integration test. 2. Application deployment and undeployment with samples in Kubernetes IaaS. 3. CEP and DAS extensions distribution. 4. Tested metering and monitoring feature with DAS HA setup in Kubernetes IaaS. Thanks. On Wed, Dec 9

Cleaning up User Artifacts at Signup Removal

2015-12-09 Thread Akila Ravihansa Perera
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam > wrote: > Hi Isuru, > > We have rebased stratos-4.1.x branch into master branch. We should > continue the development in master branch from now onwards. > +1 We should continue our dev work on master branch and do the 4.1.x releases from stra

Re: Re. multi-tenancy capability

2015-12-09 Thread David Hbase
Thanks Imesh. I will deploy a sample with routing services and in-container support, and keep update here. -D On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote: > Hi David, > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:34 PM, David Hbase wrote: > >> Hi, Team >> >> Need to confirm the "container and in-co

Re: Re. multi-tenancy capability

2015-12-09 Thread Imesh Gunaratne
Hi David, On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:34 PM, David Hbase wrote: > Hi, Team > > Need to confirm the "container and in-container multi-tenancy capability". > Is this means we can setup the Different Tenancy App within one Docker > Host or Not? > > Container multi-tenancy would use a separate set of c

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Stratos 4.1.5-RC3

2015-12-09 Thread Isuru Haththotuwa
Observed the stacktrace [1] at application undeployment in EC2. However the no impact on functionality, hence not a blocker for the release. Related jira [2]. [1]. [2015-12-09 17:15:38,789] INFO {org.apache.stratos.cloud.controller.iaases.JcloudsIaas} - Member terminated: [member-id] wso2as-521-

Re: [Vote] Release Apache Stratos 4.1.5-RC3.

2015-12-09 Thread Isuru Haththotuwa
+1. Verified: 1. Application deployment, signup addition/removal, and application undeployment on EC2 2. Application deployment/undeployment on Kubernetes. On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Gayan Gunarathne wrote: > > Hi All, > > This is the third release candidate of Apache Stratos 4.1

Re: Cleaning up User Artifacts at Signup Removal

2015-12-09 Thread Rajkumar Rajaratnam
Hi Isuru, We have rebased stratos-4.1.x branch into master branch. We should continue the development in master branch from now onwards. Thanks, Raj. On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa > wrote: > >> This is not co

[jira] [Updated] (STRATOS-1637) Restore Initial Artifacts after a Signup is Removed for a Tenant

2015-12-09 Thread Isuru Haththotuwa (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Isuru Haththotuwa updated STRATOS-1637: --- Fix Version/s: (was: FUTURE) 4.2.0 > Restore Initial Artifact

[jira] [Commented] (STRATOS-1637) Restore Initial Artifacts after a Signup is Removed for a Tenant

2015-12-09 Thread Isuru Haththotuwa (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15048985#comment-15048985 ] Isuru Haththotuwa commented on STRATOS-1637: Fixed with commits 647cb07a2c31

[jira] [Resolved] (STRATOS-1637) Restore Initial Artifacts after a Signup is Removed for a Tenant

2015-12-09 Thread Isuru Haththotuwa (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Isuru Haththotuwa resolved STRATOS-1637. Resolution: Fixed > Restore Initial Artifacts after a Signup is Removed for a Tena

Re: Cleaning up User Artifacts at Signup Removal

2015-12-09 Thread Isuru Haththotuwa
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa wrote: > This is not committed to stratos-4.1.x branch. > Correction: This is now committed to stratos-4.1.x branch. > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa > wrote: > >> Sent a PR [1] with the fix. >> >> [1]. https://github.com/

Re: Cleaning up User Artifacts at Signup Removal

2015-12-09 Thread Isuru Haththotuwa
This is not committed to stratos-4.1.x branch. On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa wrote: > Sent a PR [1] with the fix. > > [1]. https://github.com/apache/stratos/pull/498/ > > On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa > wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 11:51 AM,

[GitHub] stratos pull request: Singup deletion cleanup

2015-12-09 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/stratos/pull/498 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena

Re. multi-tenancy capability

2015-12-09 Thread David Hbase
Hi, Team Need to confirm the "container and in-container multi-tenancy capability". Is this means we can setup the Different Tenancy App within one Docker Host or Not? If yes, then how can we realize this function? is there any wiki or instruction? If no, how can we understand these features? We