I thought the other way around: application.id
Since the entity name is already there, we might not need to repeat it in
the property name.
Thanks
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Manula Chathurika Thantriwatte <
manu...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> +1, I think "application.applicationId" convent
Hi,
+1, I think "application.applicationId" convention is more readable.
Thanks !
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote:
>
> Hi Devs,
>
> As I noticed we have named most of the identity fields in the domain
> classes in the REST API as "id":
> applicationLevelNetworkPartition.i
Hi Devs,
As I noticed we have named most of the identity fields in the domain
classes in the REST API as "id":
applicationLevelNetworkPartition.id
childLevelNetworkPartition.id
childLevelPartition.id
partition.id
autoscalingPolicy.id
However application identity field is named as "applicationId":