Re: [Discuss] OpenStack Nova Dependency

2014-12-24 Thread Imesh Gunaratne
Thanks for the clarification Raj! On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam wrote: > Yes we did. > > As mentioned in my previous reply, please refer this JIRA for more > information. This contains why we did/didn't fork each modules. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-

Re: [Discuss] OpenStack Nova Dependency

2014-12-24 Thread Rajkumar Rajaratnam
Yes we did. As mentioned in my previous reply, please refer this JIRA for more information. This contains why we did/didn't fork each modules. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1002 Thanks. On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote: > Make sense, did we verify whethe

Re: [Discuss] OpenStack Nova Dependency

2014-12-24 Thread Imesh Gunaratne
Make sense, did we verify whether changes done in openstack-nova 1.8.0 fork are available in 1.8.1? Thanks On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam wrote: > Hi, > > Please refer this JIRA for more information on this jclouds upgrade from > 1.8.0 to 1.8.1 > > https://issues.apache.o

Re: [Discuss] OpenStack Nova Dependency

2014-12-24 Thread Rajkumar Rajaratnam
Hi, Please refer this JIRA for more information on this jclouds upgrade from 1.8.0 to 1.8.1 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1002 Thanks. On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam wrote: > Hi Imesh, > > This is openstack-nova 1.8.0 fork. > > We have switched to 1.8.1

Re: [Discuss] OpenStack Nova Dependency

2014-12-24 Thread Rajkumar Rajaratnam
Hi Imesh, This is openstack-nova 1.8.0 fork. We have switched to 1.8.1 from December 3rd. Thanks. On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote: > Seems like we have removed it two days ago, did we verify whether it is > used or not before removing? > > > https://github.com/apache/s

Re: [Discuss] OpenStack Nova Dependency

2014-12-24 Thread Imesh Gunaratne
Seems like we have removed it two days ago, did we verify whether it is used or not before removing? https://github.com/apache/stratos/commit/a9834e9ec1c7c9056fb36dbfcf18bc3fd73087bc#diff-ddb15574bef1e045333ad243338de9c9 On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam wrote: > Sorry for t

Re: [Discuss] OpenStack Nova Dependency

2014-12-24 Thread Rajkumar Rajaratnam
Sorry for the typo :) s/Do we the fork in our code base?/Do we have the fork in our code base? Thanks. On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam wrote: > Hi Imesh, > > We didn't fork openstack-nova 1.8.1. > > Do we the fork in our code base? Where? > > Thanks. > > On Wed, Dec 24, 20

Re: [Discuss] OpenStack Nova Dependency

2014-12-24 Thread Rajkumar Rajaratnam
Hi Imesh, We didn't fork openstack-nova 1.8.1. Do we the fork in our code base? Where? Thanks. On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote: > Does anyone know why we have forked it? > > On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Udara Liyanage wrote: > >> If we are not packaging, we can rem

Re: [Discuss] OpenStack Nova Dependency

2014-12-24 Thread Imesh Gunaratne
Does anyone know why we have forked it? On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Udara Liyanage wrote: > If we are not packaging, we can remove it > > > > Touched, not typed. Erroneous words are a feature, not a typo. > On Dec 24, 2014 9:22 PM, "Imesh Gunaratne" wrote: > >> Hi Devs, >> >> I just notice

Re: [Discuss] OpenStack Nova Dependency

2014-12-24 Thread Udara Liyanage
If we are not packaging, we can remove it Touched, not typed. Erroneous words are a feature, not a typo. On Dec 24, 2014 9:22 PM, "Imesh Gunaratne" wrote: > Hi Devs, > > I just noticed that we have forked OpenStack Nova module but we are not > packaging it. As I see in the cloud controller fea

[Discuss] OpenStack Nova Dependency

2014-12-24 Thread Imesh Gunaratne
Hi Devs, I just noticed that we have forked OpenStack Nova module but we are not packaging it. As I see in the cloud controller feature we are packaging jclouds version of it: org.apache.jclouds.api:openstack-nova:${jclouds.version} Thanks -- Imesh Gunaratne Technical Lead, WSO2 Committer