Re: Do we need "lbClusterId" anymore

That is great, Lahiru! Regards, Mariangela *--* Mariangela Hills Senior Technical Writer *WSO2, Inc.*lean.enterprise.middleware. m: +94 773 500185 w: http://wso2.com On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Lahiru Sandaruwan wrote: > Hi Mari, > > I will start removing th

Re: Do we need "lbClusterId" anymore

Hi Mari, I will start removing this in code. Thanks. On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Mariangela Hills wrote: > Hi Lahiru, > > Will you be able to remove the lbClusterId property or shall we create a > JIRA to track this task, so that no one forgets it in the future? > > Regards, > Mariangela

Re: Do we need "lbClusterId" anymore

Hi Lahiru, Will you be able to remove the lbClusterId property or shall we create a JIRA to track this task, so that no one forgets it in the future? Regards, Mariangela *--* Mariangela Hills Senior Technical Writer *WSO2, Inc.*lean.enterprise.middleware. m: +94 773 500185 w: http://wso2.com

Re: Do we need "lbClusterId" anymore

Hi Lahiru, Yes we need to remove lbClusterId property from the member definition. Now each load balancer instance will get a list of dependent cluster ids via the payload which the load balancer should serve specifically. Therefore lbClusterId property is not used anymore. Thanks On Mon, Mar 16

Do we need "lbClusterId" anymore

Hi devs, I have seen there are few places that we still have "lbClusterId" in Member and MemberContext classes. Since we have removed the LB type from the list of cartridge types, we would not recognize LB Id from Stratos POV. Do we use that for load balancing functionality? Thanks. -- -- Lahi