Reply inline. search for ##VL:
On 3/24/15, 9:08 PM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote:
Hi Vanson,
Please see my comments inline:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:06 AM, Vanson Lim mailto:v...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Reka/devs,
I am still a little bit confused about Group level and Cartridge level
deploym
Hi Vanson,
Please see my comments inline:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:06 AM, Vanson Lim wrote:
> Reka/devs,
>
> I am still a little bit confused about Group level and Cartridge level
> deployment policies and looking forward to seeing some more documentation
> on this.
>
> If we are defining a g
reached, and
> then documentation can follow.
>
>
>
> *From:* Reka Thirunavukkarasu [mailto:r...@wso2.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 19, 2015 6:31 AM
> *To:* Shaheedur Haque (shahhaqu)
> *Cc:* dev; Mariangela Hills
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Discuss] Cartridge definition doesn&#x
: dev; Mariangela Hills
Subject: Re: [Discuss] Cartridge definition doesn't need "maxInstanceLimit"
property anymore
Hi Shaheed,
Please find my comments inline. Unfortunately i think that we don't currently
have the documentation covering all the scenarios it seems..Will wo
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Shaheedur Haque (shahhaqu) <
> shahh...@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> After discussing a bit with Imesh, we identified 3 points that need
> clarifying:
>
>
>
> · If there is to be a cartridgeMin attribute, it should at least
Hi Reka,
Thanks for the detailed explanation. See below…
From: Reka Thirunavukkarasu [mailto:r...@wso2.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 5:08 AM
To: dev
Cc: Shaheedur Haque (shahhaqu)
Subject: Re: [Discuss] Cartridge definition doesn't need "maxInstanceLimit"
property anym
>>>>> application to 5 instances of PHP, why would I not simply set the
>>>>> partitionMax to 2,3 or 3,2 in the two partitions?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Similarly, I have yet to see any convincing response as t
ponse as to why
>>>> cartridgeMin is really required.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The subtle shift in behavior being claimed in these cases seems
>>>> confusing at best, and simply broken at worst. I claim broken because there
>>>>
>> written for next developer preview at [1]. This sample is an end to end
>>> sample with single cartridge application and Mock IaaS. See the step 5 for
>>> *partitionMax
>>> *usage.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>
mply broken at worst. I claim broken because there are no
>> clear rules as to how all 4 values relate, and no clear use-case to have
>> all 4. In short, I have no idea how or why I should set them.
>>
>>
>>
>> Please clarify or remove.
>>
>>
>>
eed
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Lahiru Sandaruwan [mailto:lahi...@wso2.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 17, 2015 3:43 AM
>
> *To:* dev
> *Subject:* Re: [Discuss] Cartridge definition doesn't need
> "maxInstanceLimit" property anymore
>
>
>
> Hi
, 2015 3:43 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [Discuss] Cartridge definition doesn't need "maxInstanceLimit"
property anymore
Hi Shaheed,
We can define the maximum number of instances that can be spawned per partition
in deployment policy. You can find a simple sample which is written for
tion max? Where is it specified?
>
>
>
> Thanks, Shaheed
>
>
>
> *From:* Lahiru Sandaruwan [mailto:lahi...@wso2.com]
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 14, 2015 2:31 AM
>
> *To:* dev
> *Subject:* Re: [Discuss] Cartridge definition doesn't need
> "maxInstanceLimit&quo
Hi Lahiru,
What do you mean by partition max? Where is it specified?
Thanks, Shaheed
From: Lahiru Sandaruwan [mailto:lahi...@wso2.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2015 2:31 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [Discuss] Cartridge definition doesn't need "maxInstanceLimit"
property anymor
policy values.
>
> ·What is cartridgeMax used for?
>
>
>
> Thanks, Shaheed
>
>
>
> *From:* Reka Thirunavukkarasu [mailto:r...@wso2.com ]
> *Sent:* 13 March 2015 02:54
> *To:* dev
> *Subject:* Re: [Discuss] Cartridge definition doesn't need
>
@stratos.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Discuss] Cartridge definition doesn't need "maxInstanceLimit"
property anymore
Hi Reka,
First, I strongly suggest we not use internal terms like “cluster”, since they
are not part of the user visible model, to explain user visible behaviour. F
simple and use the
deployment policy values.
·What is cartridgeMax used for?
Thanks, Shaheed
From: Reka Thirunavukkarasu [mailto:r...@wso2.com]
Sent: 13 March 2015 02:54
To: dev
Subject: Re: [Discuss] Cartridge definition doesn't need "maxInstanceLimit"
property anymore
Hi S
cartridgeMin and
> cartridgeMax. Why do we need cartridgeMin and cartridgeMax at this point in
> the system?
>
>
>
> *From:* Reka Thirunavukkarasu [mailto:r...@wso2.com]
> *Sent:* 12 March 2015 17:09
> *To:* dev
> *Subject:* Re: [Discuss] Cartridge definition doesn&
2015 17:09
To: dev
Subject: Re: [Discuss] Cartridge definition doesn't need "maxInstanceLimit"
property anymore
Hi Raj,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
mailto:rajkum...@wso2.com>> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu
mailto:
Hi Raj,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Lahiru/Raj,
>>
>> I think that we have introduced this *cartridgeMin/**cartridgeMax *when
>> introducing the deployment policy for cartridge and gr
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu
wrote:
> Hi Lahiru/Raj,
>
> I think that we have introduced this *cartridgeMin/**cartridgeMax *when
> introducing the deployment policy for cartridge and groups as global
> deployment policy. Since we have the same concept now, i would like
Hi Lahiru/Raj,
I think that we have introduced this *cartridgeMin/**cartridgeMax *when
introducing the deployment policy for cartridge and groups as global
deployment policy. Since we have the same concept now, i would like to
review the implementation and confirm whether it is required or not. Ca
Noticed today. It was misleading as we have this left in samples. I will
clean this up.
Thanks.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam
wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> We are defining cartridge min max count in application definition.
>
> {
> "applicationId": "single-cartridge-app",
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
