Re: DependencyBuilder / StartupOrder clarification

2014-10-12 Thread Isuru Haththotuwa
tils.java:127) >> > Could not reproduce this error yet. Are you still getting this? > > I'm not sure on this NPE. We will go through your definition and update on > it.. > > Thanks, > Reka > >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> Martin >> >

Re: DependencyBuilder / StartupOrder clarification

2014-10-11 Thread Reka Thirunavukkarasu
> > *From:* Reka Thirunavukkarasu [mailto:r...@wso2.com ] > *Sent:* Thursday, October 09, 2014 6:56 AM > *To:* Martin Eppel (meppel) > *Cc:* dev@stratos.apache.org; Isuru Haththotuwa (isu...@wso2.com) > *Subject:* Re: DependencyBuilder / StartupOrder clarification > > > > Hi M

RE: DependencyBuilder / StartupOrder clarification

2014-10-09 Thread Martin Eppel (meppel)
(ParserUtils.java:127) Thanks Martin From: Martin Eppel (meppel) Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 9:32 AM To: Reka Thirunavukkarasu Cc: dev@stratos.apache.org; Isuru Haththotuwa (isu...@wso2.com) Subject: RE: DependencyBuilder / StartupOrder clarification Great, thanks – sure will continue the testing

RE: DependencyBuilder / StartupOrder clarification

2014-10-09 Thread Martin Eppel (meppel)
Great, thanks – sure will continue the testing, Regards Martin From: Reka Thirunavukkarasu [mailto:r...@wso2.com] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 6:56 AM To: Martin Eppel (meppel) Cc: dev@stratos.apache.org; Isuru Haththotuwa (isu...@wso2.com) Subject: Re: DependencyBuilder / StartupOrder

Re: DependencyBuilder / StartupOrder clarification

2014-10-09 Thread Reka Thirunavukkarasu
Hi Martin, On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu wrote: > Thanks Martin for the changes... > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) > wrote: > >> Hi Reka, >> >> >> >> I adjusted the remaining code to the new scheme and also modified the >> code in the Dependen

Re: DependencyBuilder / StartupOrder clarification

2014-10-08 Thread Reka Thirunavukkarasu
Thanks Martin for the changes... On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) wrote: > Hi Reka, > > > > I adjusted the remaining code to the new scheme and also modified the code > in the DependencyBuilder (and checked it in) but I am not sure if it is > correct, again, since I am not

Re: DependencyBuilder / StartupOrder clarification

2014-10-08 Thread Reka Thirunavukkarasu
Hi Martin, On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) wrote: > Hi Reka, > > > > I need some clarification on how the DependencyBuilder is supposed to work > (while I am trying to replace the code with the new scheme to represent the > startup order). > > > > In the class StartupOrd

RE: DependencyBuilder / StartupOrder clarification

2014-10-08 Thread Martin Eppel (meppel)
Hi Reka, I adjusted the remaining code to the new scheme and also modified the code in the DependencyBuilder (and checked it in) but I am not sure if it is correct, again, since I am not clear on the use of “private List startList;” , please take a look and let me know how it is supposed to w