Orders": [
>
> "group.group7,cartridge.tomcat2"
>
> ],
>
> "terminationBehaviour": "terminate-all"
>
> }
>
> }
>
>
>
Yah..This is correct definition for your mentioned use case..As you have
mention
;: [
"tomcat2"
],
"dependencies": {
"startupOrders": [
"group.group7,cartridge.tomcat2"
],
"terminationBehaviour": "terminate-all"
}
}
Th
From: Reka Thirunavukkarasu [mailto:r..
Resending it in case you missed it
Thanks
Martin
From: Martin Eppel (meppel)
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 1:42 PM
To: dev@stratos.apache.org
Subject: RE: Global Deployment Policy for the Application
Hi Reka,
I was looking at the attached samples and had a few questions:
Did we change the
t;
> "tomcat1"
>
> ]
>
> }
>
>
>
> ],
>
> "cartridges": [
>
> "tomcat2"
>
> ],
>
> "dependencies": {
>
> "startupOrders": [
&g
Martin Eppel (meppel)
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 1:42 PM
To: dev@stratos.apache.org
Subject: RE: Global Deployment Policy for the Application
Hi Reka,
I was looking at the attached samples and had a few questions:
Did we change the group format ? In the sample you sent out there is a group6
and gro
"startupOrders": [
"group.group7,cartridge.tomcat2"
],
"terminationBehaviour": "terminate-all"
}
}
From: Martin Eppel (meppel)
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 11:49 AM
To: dev@stratos.apache.org
Subject: RE: Global Deploy
Thanks Reka,
From: Reka Thirunavukkarasu [mailto:r...@wso2.com]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 11:43 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Global Deployment Policy for the Application
Hi Martin,
I have attached here with the sample application definition and the deployment
policy. Could you please have a
quot;partition": [
>>
>> {
>>
>> "id": "RegionOne-Core",
>>
>> "partitionMax": "1",
>>
>> "*partitionMin": "1"*
>>
>> }
>>
>&g
orkPartition[1..n]
+ id
+ partition[1..n]
+ id
+ max
? + min ?
From: Martin Eppel (meppel)
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 4:32 PM
To: dev@stratos.apache.org
Subject: RE: Global Dep
Hi Reka,
We also need an extra parameter for group deployment policies which defines if
“children” (or group member) should be collocated (or not), please see in the
grouping specification “these Children must be physically next to each other”,
not sure how this will expressed in the applicati
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu
wrote:
> Hi Lahiru,
>
> [Re-sending as content seems missing]
>
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Lahiru Sandaruwan
> wrote:
>
>> Looks good Reka,
>>
>> We might need to get the minimum count of instances of a particular
>> cluster.
>>
>>
Hi Lahiru,
[Re-sending as content seems missing]
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Lahiru Sandaruwan
wrote:
> Looks good Reka,
>
> We might need to get the minimum count of instances of a particular
> cluster.
>
> We can get it per cluster which will be effective for all the network
> partition
Hi Lahiru,
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Lahiru Sandaruwan
wrote:
> Looks good Reka,
>
> We might need to get the minimum count of instances of a particular
> cluster.
>
> We can get it per cluster which will be effective for all the network
> partitions or per network partition.
>
> If it
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Lahiru Sandaruwan
> wrote:
>
>> Looks good Reka,
>>
>> We might need to get the minimum count of instances of a particular
>> cluster.
>>
> +1, this should be min per cluster instance AFAIU.
>
Cor
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Lahiru Sandaruwan
wrote:
> Looks good Reka,
>
> We might need to get the minimum count of instances of a particular
> cluster.
>
+1, this should be min per cluster instance AFAIU.
>
> We can get it per cluster which will be effective for all the network
> partit
Looks good Reka,
We might need to get the minimum count of instances of a particular cluster.
We can get it per cluster which will be effective for all the network
partitions or per network partition.
If it is per cluster,
+ id
+ applicationPolicy[1..1]
+ appId
+ networkPartitio
16 matches
Mail list logo
