RE: Maintenance modes (was RE: [jira] [Commented] (STRATOS-1234) Software Update Management Solution for Stratos)

2015-05-07 Thread Martin Eppel (meppel)
: Sandaruwan Nanayakkara (JIRA); Imesh Gunaratne (im...@wso2.com); Shaheedur Haque (shahhaqu); Ryan Du Plessis (rdupless) Subject: Re: Maintenance modes (was RE: [jira] [Commented] (STRATOS-1234) Software Update Management Solution for Stratos) +1, shall we have a call sometime next week? On Thursday

Re: Maintenance modes (was RE: [jira] [Commented] (STRATOS-1234) Software Update Management Solution for Stratos)

2015-05-07 Thread Lakmal Warusawithana
components affected or need to be reworked ? > > > > The other question would be what will be the best or recommended way to > develop the feature with the input from the community and to ensure a > smooth integration with the stratos master ? > > > > > > Thanks > >

RE: Maintenance modes (was RE: [jira] [Commented] (STRATOS-1234) Software Update Management Solution for Stratos)

2015-05-06 Thread Martin Eppel (meppel)
RE: Maintenance modes (was RE: [jira] [Commented] (STRATOS-1234) Software Update Management Solution for Stratos) Hi Imesh, Sandaruwan, Here is a written-up proposal. I *think* it covers the various use cases suggested both here and in JIRA STRATOS-1234, but as always, your thoughts on the mat

RE: Maintenance modes (was RE: [jira] [Commented] (STRATOS-1234) Software Update Management Solution for Stratos)

2015-04-09 Thread Shaheedur Haque (shahhaqu)
that may spin up under a given deployment. From: Imesh Gunaratne [mailto:im...@apache.org] Sent: 27 March 2015 04:21 To: dev Subject: Re: Maintenance modes (was RE: [jira] [Commented] (STRATOS-1234) Software Update Management Solution for Stratos) Hi Shaheed, A really good suggestion! I think

Re: Maintenance modes (was RE: [jira] [Commented] (STRATOS-1234) Software Update Management Solution for Stratos)

2015-03-26 Thread Imesh Gunaratne
Hi Shaheed, A really good suggestion! I think we could to manage what you have suggested in the same implementation as they overlap. I'm +1 for the idea of putting a cluster into the "Maintenance Mode" manually for diagnostic purposes and stop autoscaling it. We could introduce new API methods to