2009/12/17 Wes Wannemacher :
> Anyhow, it's funny that you found this, because that step isn't
> relevant to releasing archetypes, since it pertains to the assembly
> zips.
I noticed a problem with coping files on a server - the
m2-staging-repo folder was different than that specified in guideline
Good catch, thanks for fixing it... I think there is a difference
between those two poms. The struts2-parent is the parent for struts*2*
stuff and struts-master is the parent for all struts stuff... So,
struts2-parent can be viewed as a child of struts-master. For
instance, all of us are listed in
2009/12/16 Lukasz Lenart :
> I have no idea what is wrong - maybe the problem is with a parent -
> the poms in archetypes are pointing to struts-master but struts-core's
> pom is pointing to struts-parent, khe?
I think that's the problem, in struts2-parent struts-staging repo is defined as
scp://p
I have no idea what is wrong - maybe the problem is with a parent -
the poms in archetypes are pointing to struts-master but struts-core's
pom is pointing to struts-parent, khe?
Regards
--
Lukasz
http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To
hum, maybe the docs are out of date, but I am pretty sure there was a
version there. Maybe the URL is not pointing to the right place for
the archetypes.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> In docs there is that I should execute such a commands:
>
> ssh people.apache.org
> cd
In docs there is that I should execute such a commands:
ssh people.apache.org
cd /www/people.apache.org/builds/struts/$VERSION
find m2-staging-repository -name "*.zip*"-exec cp {} . \;
but I noticed that Maven release plugin is uploading into
/www/people.apache.org/builds/struts/m2-staging-re
I'm on my phone, so I didn't read the links. I would say to use our
docs though because musachy and I update those docs every time we
release something.
On 12/16/09, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> Another problem, should I use setting from here [1] or from here [2]
> regarding Maven servers?
>
> [1] http
Lukasz, I don't think there have been any changes to struts
annotations since I ran the last release of it. And I don't think
there is a dependency to it from any of the archetypes.
On 12/16/09, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> Should I release Struts Annotations first? I think is not needed as
> archetype
Another problem, should I use setting from here [1] or from here [2]
regarding Maven servers?
[1] http://maven.apache.org/developers/committer-settings.html
[2]
http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/creating-and-signing-a-struts-21x-distribution.html#CreatingandSigningaStruts2.1.xDistribution-UpdateM
Should I release Struts Annotations first? I think is not needed as
archetypes don't base on it. Help! :D
Regards
--
Lukasz
http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional co
2009/12/15 Musachy Barroso :
> sure, what do you need from us?
Answers when I would get problem ;-)
Regards
--
Lukasz
http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional command
sure, what do you need from us?
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> 2009/12/6 phillips1021 :
>> Is there an update on when the Struts 2 archetypes will be available?
>
> I'm planning to release them tomorrow - Wes, musachy I hope you can
> support me :D
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Lu
2009/12/6 phillips1021 :
> Is there an update on when the Struts 2 archetypes will be available?
I'm planning to release them tomorrow - Wes, musachy I hope you can
support me :D
Regards
--
Lukasz
http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
T
Is there an update on when the Struts 2 archetypes will be available?
Bruce
Lukasz Lenart wrote:
>
> 2009/11/13 Musachy Barroso :
>> Any plans to deploy them now that 2.1.8.1 is out? After voting on them
>> of course :)
>
> Next week I've been planing to start a vote, if I learn how Maven
> r
I don't know how the archetypes are released, but it is probably the
same as the main distro. It will deploy to the staging repository, you
start a vote, and if it passes, then you need to manually copy it to
the main dir, and from there it is copied automatically to the maven
repo.
musachy
On Fr
2009/11/13 Musachy Barroso :
> Any plans to deploy them now that 2.1.8.1 is out? After voting on them
> of course :)
Next week I've been planing to start a vote, if I learn how Maven
release process is working ;-)
Regards
--
Lukasz
http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Any plans to deploy them now that 2.1.8.1 is out? After voting on them
of course :)
musachy
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> 2.1.8.1 should be the next GA, so I would go with that
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Lukasz Lenart
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Should I point al
2.1.8.1 should be the next GA, so I would go with that
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Should I point all archetypes to 2.1.8.1 version or stay with 2.1.8?
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Lukasz
> http://www.lenart.org.pl/
> http://dailylog.lenart.org.pl/
>
>
On 8/29/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oops, this should be
-Ted.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/28/06, Jason Carreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The idea is simple: In most apps, 90+% of actions will fall into one of a few
"types" which
will have very similar configuration. If we can pull these commonalities out
into what I
was calling "architypes", then we can just specify which ar
> I might be missing some of the context and previous
> discussion, but thought I'd chime in anyway...
>
> I think this is a *terrible* idea. Great for crud
> apps, but as a very heavy user of webwork 1 (and 2,
> increasingly) purely as a *user*, commands (the !
> stuff) are very very useful.
To
I might be missing some of the context and previous discussion, but thought I'd
chime in anyway...
I think this is a *terrible* idea. Great for crud apps, but as a very heavy
user of webwork 1 (and 2, increasingly) purely as a *user*, commands (the !
stuff) are very very useful.
They're also v
22 matches
Mail list logo
