Re: OGNL and parameters

2008-07-17 Thread Musachy Barroso
> I haven't seen any obstacles to a change like that. It would be nice if we > could reuse a param binding implementation with type-conversion from > somewhere else rather reinvent another. Yes, definitely. Any suggestions? What is the status of Commons beanutils? musachy -- "Hey you! Would you

Re: OGNL and parameters

2008-07-16 Thread Jeromy Evans
Musachy Barroso wrote: Should we continue to use OGNL for parameter binding? This creates so many possible security holes, in exchange for pretty much nothing, when parameter names should be simple (indexing + the old A.B.C notation). Are there any uses cases where the full OGNL power is needed,

Re: OGNL and parameters

2008-07-16 Thread Brian Pontarelli
I wrote my own for the JCatapult MVC and it does most of the parameter setting stuff that OGNL does and a few other things like handling generics correctly and completely. It also has a pretty solid type conversion API. Took about 3 days to write, test and complete. Feel free to grab the co