Hi,
Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 04:14:08PM -, Jon Foster wrote:
> > Add --using-external-locking option to svnsync.
> Hi Jon,
>
> I've finally found time to take a look at this. Sorry for taking so
> long. I have committed your patch in r910212, with some tweaks.
Thankyo
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 04:14:08PM -, Jon Foster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As discussed on this list, we don't always need svnsync's networked
> lock. If svnsync only runs on a single server, the administrator
> can use the "flock" tool to prevent running multiple copies of
> svnsync at the same time.
Hi,
Julian Foad wrote:
> Gavin 'Beau' Baumanis wrote:
> > Hi Jon,
> >
> > I have logged your patch into the issue tracker: #3545
> > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3545
>
> Hi Gavin. It's great that you are keeping these patches under control.
I
> have a couple of suggestion
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Julian Foad [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 09 December 2009 13:11
To: Gavin 'Beau' Baumanis
Cc: Jon Foster; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add svnsync --use-external-locking option
Gavin 'Beau' Baumanis wro
Gavin 'Beau' Baumanis wrote:
> On 10/12/2009, at 00:11 , Julian Foad wrote:
[...]
> > 1. It's probably a good idea to point out in these emails that logging
> > the patch into the issue tracker does not very much increase the chance
> > of it being applied, it just makes it easier for us to keep tr
Hi Julian,
On 10/12/2009, at 00:11 , Julian Foad wrote:
> Gavin 'Beau' Baumanis wrote:
>> Hi Jon,
>>
>> I have logged your patch into the issue tracker: #3545
>> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3545
>
> Hi Gavin. It's great that you are keeping these patches under control. I
Gavin 'Beau' Baumanis wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> I have logged your patch into the issue tracker: #3545
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3545
Hi Gavin. It's great that you are keeping these patches under control. I
have a couple of suggestions:
1. It's probably a good idea to poin
Hi Jon,
I have logged your patch into the issue tracker: #3545
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3545
Gavin
On 28/11/2009, at 03:32 , Jon Foster wrote:
> [Very sorry, my mailserver appears to be dropping attachments
> and mangling inline patches by word-wrapping them.
> Try
Ping.
This Patch submission has received no comments.
Gavin.
On 28/11/2009, at 03:32 , Jon Foster wrote:
> [Very sorry, my mailserver appears to be dropping attachments
> and mangling inline patches by word-wrapping them.
> Trying yet again, with patch as a ZIP file.]
>
> Hi,
>
> As discussed
[Sorry, my mailserver appears to be dropping attachments today.
Trying again, with patch inline at end of the mail]
Hi,
As discussed on this list, we don't always need svnsync's networked
lock. If svnsync only runs on a single server, the administrator
can use the "flock" tool to prevent runnin
Hi,
As discussed on this list, we don't always need svnsync's networked
lock. If svnsync only runs on a single server, the administrator
can use the "flock" tool to prevent running multiple copies of
svnsync at the same time.
And if svnsync's lock is not needed, then it is actually an
inconvenie
11 matches
Mail list logo
