Re: [DISCUSS] CMake for Apache Thrift

2014-11-30 Thread Roger Meier
yes, as soon as we have reached full CMake build autotools can be removed. However, I guess we need a few months to get it up and running. So autoconf and CMake will be there for a while. We will prepare a pull request, during the next two weeks. -roger Quoting Henrique Mendonça : Hey guys,

Re: [DISCUSS] CMake for Apache Thrift

2014-11-25 Thread Henrique Mendonça
Hey guys, I think Roger also meant to only have one build system. Probably only having both while we port everything to cmake, but only one will be officially supported at a time. Not sure how much work is involved for the non-C libraries, wasn't facebook also using cmake? can we get anything fro

Re: [DISCUSS] CMake for Apache Thrift

2014-11-25 Thread Sergei Nikulov
2014-11-24 23:36 GMT+03:00 Roger Meier : > Hi all > > The Apache Thrift compiler is optionally using CMake already and we had > very good experience by using CMake also for the cpp library to get it up > and running on Linux-ARM, Linux-x86, Windows CE and Windows. > > I like to propose CMake as an

Re: AW: [DISCUSS] CMake for Apache Thrift

2014-11-25 Thread Konrad Grochowski
e :) -KG Von: Konrad Grochowski Gesendet: 25.11.2014 01:00 An: dev@thrift.apache.org Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] CMake for Apache Thrift cmake can generate vcxproj files from it's CMakeLists.txt (not sure if that requires something specific on CMakeLists part). So Visual Projects could be re

AW: [DISCUSS] CMake for Apache Thrift

2014-11-25 Thread Jens Geyer
> So Visual Projects could be removed from repo and generated for example as part of release. Or development process. Right? Von: Konrad Grochowski Gesendet: 25.11.2014 01:00 An: dev@thrift.apache.org Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] CMake for Apache Thrift cmake

Re: [DISCUSS] CMake for Apache Thrift

2014-11-24 Thread Jake Farrell
gt;> JensG >> >> >> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- From: Jake Farrell >> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 11:04 PM >> To: dev@thrift.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CMake for Apache Thrift >> >> I do not think that we should run both autoto

Re: [DISCUSS] CMake for Apache Thrift

2014-11-24 Thread Konrad Grochowski
apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CMake for Apache Thrift I do not think that we should run both autotools and cmake in parallel. There are enough pieces that get missed when new client libraries or files are added that make putting the releases together harder than they need to be without having to

Re: [DISCUSS] CMake for Apache Thrift

2014-11-24 Thread Jens Geyer
JensG -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- From: Jake Farrell Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 11:04 PM To: dev@thrift.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CMake for Apache Thrift I do not think that we should run both autotools and cmake in parallel. There are enough pieces that get missed when new client libraries or

Re: [DISCUSS] CMake for Apache Thrift

2014-11-24 Thread Jake Farrell
I do not think that we should run both autotools and cmake in parallel. There are enough pieces that get missed when new client libraries or files are added that make putting the releases together harder than they need to be without having to make sure that its mirrored into an additional build sys

Re: [DISCUSS] CMake for Apache Thrift

2014-11-24 Thread Konrad Grochowski
Hey, Sounds great - although I prefer scons-type of tools, everything more flexible/portable than autotools is good :) If we assume that cmake will replace automake completely (so we won't support two building systems at once, like with compiler right now) than a huge +1 from me. Best, Konra

[DISCUSS] CMake for Apache Thrift

2014-11-24 Thread Roger Meier
Hi all The Apache Thrift compiler is optionally using CMake already and we had very good experience by using CMake also for the cpp library to get it up and running on Linux-ARM, Linux-x86, Windows CE and Windows. I like to propose CMake as an additional build system for Apache Thrift. Goal: Ex