Re: [PROPOSAL] Immutable java codegen

2016-02-02 Thread John Sirois
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:15 AM, John Sirois wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:04 AM, BCG wrote: > >> On 01/28/2016 12:06 PM, John Sirois wrote: >> >>> I've filed an issue that proposes either adding an option to the `java` >>> gen >>> lang or else adding a new gen kang (ala `javame`) tha

Re: [PROPOSAL] Immutable java codegen

2016-01-28 Thread John Sirois
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:04 AM, BCG wrote: > On 01/28/2016 12:06 PM, John Sirois wrote: > >> I've filed an issue that proposes either adding an option to the `java` >> gen >> lang or else adding a new gen kang (ala `javame`) that effects generation >> of immutable thrift structs and unions for

Re: [PROPOSAL] Immutable java codegen

2016-01-28 Thread BCG
On 01/28/2016 12:06 PM, John Sirois wrote: I've filed an issue that proposes either adding an option to the `java` gen lang or else adding a new gen kang (ala `javame`) that effects generation of immutable thrift structs and unions for java: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3583 I ha

[PROPOSAL] Immutable java codegen

2016-01-28 Thread John Sirois
I've filed an issue that proposes either adding an option to the `java` gen lang or else adding a new gen kang (ala `javame`) that effects generation of immutable thrift structs and unions for java: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3583 I have positive feedback from the Apache Aurora p