[jira] [Commented] (THRIFT-1394) Treatment of optional fields is not consistent between C++ and Java

2012-01-26 Thread Hudson (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-1394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13194478#comment-13194478 ] Hudson commented on THRIFT-1394: Integrated in Thrift #398 (See [https://builds.apache.or

[jira] [Commented] (THRIFT-1394) Treatment of optional fields is not consistent between C++ and Java

2012-01-23 Thread Diwaker Gupta (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-1394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13191481#comment-13191481 ] Diwaker Gupta commented on THRIFT-1394: --- Bump. Jake? > Treatment o

[jira] [Commented] (THRIFT-1394) Treatment of optional fields is not consistent between C++ and Java

2011-12-12 Thread Diwaker Gupta (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-1394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13167961#comment-13167961 ] Diwaker Gupta commented on THRIFT-1394: --- Jake, considering that the current C++ <->

[jira] [Commented] (THRIFT-1394) Treatment of optional fields is not consistent between C++ and Java

2011-10-19 Thread Jake Farrell (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-1394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13131320#comment-13131320 ] Jake Farrell commented on THRIFT-1394: -- Diwaker, this patch fixes the immediate prob